Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CHARLES SCHWERTNER

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 58127 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$54,000.00
Client Filers
5
Payments
24
Activity Range
08/26/2011–10/07/2025
Largest Payment
$5,000.00
Graph: 5 connected filers · 24 payments · $54,000.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1American Pharmacy Coalition Inc. GPAC$44,500.001912/05/2024
2American Pharmacies Texas PAC$5,000.00210/07/2025
3Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$2,500.00112/02/2016
4Texas Land Developers Association PAC$1,000.00112/08/2016
5Environmental Defense Action Fund Texas PAC$1,000.00112/13/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
4 80.0% 325 1.2%
Angela Paxton
Vendor ID 17133
3 60.0% 4 50.0%
ARMANDO MARTINEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 20120
3 60.0% 156 1.9%
TRACY KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 331882
3 60.0% 156 1.9%
ROBERT NICHOLS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 266292
3 60.0% 197 1.5%
BRYAN HUGHES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 44066
3 60.0% 230 1.3%
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
3 60.0% 253 1.2%
Cecil Bell
Vendor ID 55503
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Charles Perry
Vendor ID 58082
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Chris Turner
Vendor ID 61897
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
Stan Gerdes
Vendor ID 293987
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
Tom Oliverson
Vendor ID 329666
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/03/2026Texas Health Care Assn. PAC$1,000.00Campaign Contribution.
05/15/2026Texas BOMA PAC$1,000.00PAC Contribution
04/16/2026Boating Trades Association of Metropolitan Houston PAC$1,000.00Political Contribution
04/14/2026Texas Property Tax Lienholders Association PAC$5,000.00Donation to Senate campaign fund
03/31/2026Independent Bankers Association of Texas Political Action Committee$1,500.002026 General campaign contribution for Charles Schwertner, Senate Distr 5
03/30/2026Rural Friends of Texas Electric Cooperatives$3,000.00Campaign Contributions
03/24/2026United Services Automobile Association Employee PAC$5,000.00Charles Schwertner/Support/2026 General
03/15/2026North Texas Automobile Dealers PAC$5,000.00Political contribution
02/25/2026K & L Gates LLP Committee for Good Government$2,000.00Campaign contribution to support candidate
02/23/2026TXTA General PAC$350.00In-Kind Donation
02/18/2026Texas Deer Association Political Action Committee$2,500.00donation
02/12/2026State Farm Agents Political Action Committee$3,000.00 Political Contribution
02/11/2026Dow Inc. PAC$3,000.00Charles Schwertner/Support/2026 Primary
02/11/2026The Beer Alliance of Texas Political Action Committee$1,500.00Campaign contribution
02/09/2026Incline PAC$5,000.00Campaign contribution
02/05/2026Texas Construction Assn. PAC$5,000.00Campaign contribution
02/02/2026Jackson Walker L.L.P. Political Action Committee$2,500.00Campaign contribution
02/02/2026Occidental Petroleum Corporation Political Action Committee$2,500.00Charles Schwertner/Support/2026 Primary
02/02/2026Texas Assn. Of Pawnbrokers PAC$2,000.00 Contribution to a current officeholder seeking reelection.
01/29/2026Valero Energy Corporation PAC$5,000.00Charles Schwertner/Support/2026 Primary
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.