Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CITI CARDS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 64109 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$1,104,932.31
Client Filers
55
Payments
765
Activity Range
12/11/2002–06/22/2026
Largest Payment
$30,761.25
Graph: 55 connected filers · 765 payments · $1,104,932.31 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- CITI CARDS
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
41 | 74.5% | 3,017 | 1.4% |
|
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
|
30 | 54.5% | 946 | 3.1% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
30 | 54.5% | 1,876 | 1.6% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
29 | 52.7% | 1,480 | 1.9% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
29 | 52.7% | 1,571 | 1.8% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
28 | 50.9% | 1,174 | 2.3% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
24 | 43.6% | 898 | 2.6% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
24 | 43.6% | 1,360 | 1.7% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
23 | 41.8% | 1,101 | 2.0% |
|
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
|
22 | 40.0% | 393 | 5.2% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
22 | 40.0% | 1,327 | 1.6% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
22 | 40.0% | 1,445 | 1.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $879.28 | Payment |
| 06/22/2026 | King, Tracy O. (The Honorable) | $269.34 | Credit card payment for campaign or officeholder purposes. |
| 06/10/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $879.27 | Payment |
| 05/21/2026 | King, Tracy O. (The Honorable) | $501.39 | Credit card payment for campaign or officeholder purposes. |
| 05/21/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Payment |
| 05/11/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Payment |
| 05/04/2026 | Hughes, D. Bryan (The Honorable) | $2,150.71 | Payment of campaign/officeholder expenses charged to credit card |
| 04/21/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $1,275.77 | Payment |
| 04/21/2026 | King, Tracy O. (The Honorable) | $259.26 | Credit card payment for campaign or officeholder purposes. |
| 04/10/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $1,275.76 | Payment |
| 04/03/2026 | Hughes, D. Bryan (The Honorable) | $3,553.77 | Payment of campaign/officeholder expenses charged to credit card |
| 04/03/2026 | Hughes, D. Bryan (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Payment of campaign/officeholder expenses charged to credit card |
| 03/23/2026 | King, Tracy O. (The Honorable) | $521.26 | Credit card payment for campaign or officeholder purposes. |
| 03/10/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $905.36 | Payment |
| 02/26/2026 | Hughes, D. Bryan (The Honorable) | $2,446.51 | Payment of campaign/officeholder expenses charged to credit card |
| 02/26/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $878.46 | Payment |
| 02/23/2026 | King, Tracy O. (The Honorable) | $639.58 | Credit card payment for campaign or officeholder purposes. |
| 02/11/2026 | Martinez, Armando A. (The Honorable) | $878.45 | Payment |
| 02/09/2026 | Meyer, Morgan D. (The Honorable) | $16.55 | Credit card payment for expenditures reported in F4 |
| 01/22/2026 | Hughes, D. Bryan (The Honorable) | $1,041.98 | Payment of campaign/officeholder expenses charged to credit card |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.