Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JL Turner Legal Association
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 166106 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$19,753.50
Client Filers
22
Payments
69
Activity Range
06/22/2006–12/12/2025
Largest Payment
$2,500.00
Graph: 22 connected filers · 69 payments · $19,753.50 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- JL Turner Legal Association
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DALLAS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 82606
|
20 | 90.9% | 304 | 6.5% |
|
DEMOCRACY TOOLBOX
Vendor ID 88022
|
16 | 72.7% | 114 | 13.3% |
|
DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 82368
|
16 | 72.7% | 147 | 10.5% |
|
STATE BAR OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 295203
|
15 | 68.2% | 418 | 3.5% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
15 | 68.2% | 3,017 | 0.5% |
|
PRESTON HOLLOW DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 249406
|
13 | 59.1% | 52 | 21.3% |
|
EDWARDS & PATTERSON SIGNS
Vendor ID 100071
|
13 | 59.1% | 96 | 12.4% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
13 | 59.1% | 1,669 | 0.8% |
|
THE ORDER DESK
Vendor ID 322448
|
12 | 54.5% | 101 | 10.8% |
|
TEXAS CENTER FOR THE JUDICIARY
Vendor ID 310161
|
12 | 54.5% | 460 | 2.6% |
|
Dallas County East Democrats
Vendor ID 82640
|
11 | 50.0% | 55 | 16.7% |
|
STONEWALL DEMOCRATS OF DALLAS
Vendor ID 297401
|
11 | 50.0% | 80 | 12.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2025 | Hoffman, Margaret (Ms.) | $33.00 | Holiday party |
| 12/11/2025 | Purdy, Monica McCoy (The Honorable) | $500.00 | Advertising sponsorship of event |
| 12/05/2025 | Alexander, Sindhu M. (Ms.) | $500.00 | event sponsor - gold level for holiday party/scholarship |
| 10/01/2025 | Birmingham, Brandon T. (The Honorable) | $100.00 | Sponsorship of Scholarship fund |
| 09/21/2025 | Purdy, Monica McCoy (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Advertising sponsorship of event |
| 09/19/2025 | Aceves, Maria F. (The Honorable) | $150.00 | Advertising sponsorship of event |
| 09/12/2025 | Frazier, Veretta L (The Honorable) | $1,150.00 | Advertising sponsorship of event |
| 09/12/2025 | Redmond, Aiesha (The Honorable) | $100.00 | JL Turner scholarship contribution |
| 09/05/2025 | Shelby, Tracie M. (Ms.) | $75.00 | Membership Fees |
| 06/21/2025 | Parker, Tonya (The Honorable) | $1,000.00 | Advertising sponsorship of Scholarship Gala |
| 11/12/2024 | Parker, Tonya (The Honorable) | $75.00 | Membership dues |
| 11/03/2024 | Redmond, Aiesha (The Honorable) | $100.00 | J.L. Turner Legal Association donation for scholarship |
| 09/17/2024 | Redmond, Aiesha (The Honorable) | $350.00 | JL turner gala tickets |
| 11/12/2023 | Parker, Tonya (The Honorable) | $75.00 | Membership dues |
| 10/13/2023 | Purdy, Monica McCoy (The Honorable) | $200.00 | Gift to judges scholarship program |
| 10/08/2023 | Collins, Dominique L. (The Honorable) | $100.00 | Event ticket |
| 10/08/2023 | Aceves, Maria F. (The Honorable) | $50.00 | Gala ticket |
| 10/06/2023 | Riley, Audra D. (The Honorable) | $150.00 | Awards Banquet |
| 10/03/2023 | Frazier, Veretta L (The Honorable) | $200.00 | Advertising sponsorship of event |
| 10/03/2023 | Redmond, Aiesha (The Honorable) | $200.00 | Gala sponsorship |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.