Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
DEMOCRACY TOOLBOX
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 88022 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$5,991,780.79
Client Filers
114
Payments
2,023
Activity Range
08/16/2005–06/02/2026
Largest Payment
$125,000.00
Graph: 114 connected filers · 2,023 payments · $5,991,780.79 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- DEMOCRACY TOOLBOX
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DALLAS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 82606
|
92 | 80.7% | 304 | 28.2% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
75 | 65.8% | 1,669 | 4.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
63 | 55.3% | 3,017 | 2.1% |
|
THE ORDER DESK
Vendor ID 322448
|
58 | 50.9% | 101 | 36.9% |
|
REILLY ECHOLS PRINTING
Vendor ID 258755
|
53 | 46.5% | 146 | 25.6% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
51 | 44.7% | 1,958 | 2.5% |
|
EDWARDS & PATTERSON SIGNS
Vendor ID 100071
|
44 | 38.6% | 96 | 26.5% |
|
DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 82368
|
44 | 38.6% | 147 | 20.3% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
43 | 37.7% | 1,174 | 3.5% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
43 | 37.7% | 1,445 | 2.8% |
|
DONORBOX
Vendor ID 93712
|
38 | 33.3% | 89 | 23.0% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
38 | 33.3% | 1,077 | 3.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2026 | Plumlee, Andrea D. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | installment payment |
| 05/26/2026 | Hoffman, Peggy | $3,500.00 | postage and prints |
| 05/20/2026 | Alexander, Sindhu M. (Ms.) | $1,000.00 | text campaign |
| 05/16/2026 | Hoffman, Peggy | $2,500.00 | paid block walkers |
| 05/16/2026 | Hoffman, Peggy | $1,500.00 | text messaging |
| 05/11/2026 | Ginsberg, Elizabeth C. (Mrs.) | $10,000.00 | Campaign, consulting communications and management services |
| 05/05/2026 | Snell Smith, Ashley (Mrs.) | $9,000.00 | Campaign consulting, fundraising, management and communications |
| 05/03/2026 | Hoffman, Peggy | $19,000.00 | for digital campaign |
| 04/29/2026 | Alexander, Sindhu M. (Ms.) | $19,000.00 | digital and text messaging campaign |
| 04/21/2026 | Frazier, Veretta L (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | Campaign consulting, fundraising, management and communications |
| 04/21/2026 | Purdy, Monica McCoy (The Honorable) | $4,500.00 | Campaign consulting, fundraising, management and communications |
| 04/13/2026 | Hoffman, Peggy | $2,000.00 | Consulting fee |
| 04/11/2026 | Molberg, Kenneth H. (The Honorable) | $600.00 | Campaign management services |
| 04/09/2026 | Herbert, Zachary D. (Mr.) | $4,500.00 | communications, polling |
| 04/09/2026 | Reichek, Amanda (The Honorable) | $3,500.00 | Consulting fee |
| 04/09/2026 | Alexander, Sindhu M. (Ms.) | $2,000.00 | consulting- runoff |
| 04/05/2026 | Plumlee, Andrea D. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | installment payment |
| 03/25/2026 | Aceves, Maria F. (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | Campaign consulting, fundraising, management and communications services |
| 03/03/2026 | Garza, Hector H. (The Honorable) | $2,400.00 | Text Messaging |
| 03/03/2026 | Garza, Hector H. (The Honorable) | $2,400.00 | Text Messaging |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.