Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 14501 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$26,152.74
Client Filers
44
Payments
80
Activity Range
11/16/2000–11/12/2019
Largest Payment
$2,500.00
Graph: 44 connected filers · 80 payments · $26,152.74 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Hunter, Todd A. (The Honorable)$15,881.501603/01/2016
2Duncan, Robert L. (The Honorable)$1,000.00205/08/2017
3Workman for Texas$1,000.00105/14/2014
4Shelton, Pat (Mr.)$800.00105/09/2008
5Oliveira, Rene O.$629.07301/29/2007
6Anderson, John$600.00105/10/2009
7Jackson, James M. (Mr.)$500.00111/29/2013
8Wentworth, E. Jeffrey$500.00104/15/2002
9Lopez, Leticia$350.00406/03/2005
10Van de Putte, Leticia (Mrs.)$349.17401/20/2014
11Guzman, Eva$300.00105/08/2009
12Sullivan, Kent$300.00105/06/2009
13Brown, Jeff$300.00105/07/2009
14Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$300.00109/09/2011
15Hinojosa, Juan J.$275.00310/27/2006
16Smith, Richard Wayne$275.00202/19/2006
17Truitt, Vicki$200.00305/27/2011
18Cook, Byron (Mr.)$200.00208/08/2011
19Flores, Roberto (Mr.)$165.00212/29/2011
20Rodriguez, Eduardo$157.00210/01/2012

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
35 79.5% 1,360 2.6%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
35 79.5% 3,017 1.2%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
32 72.7% 1,174 2.7%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
32 72.7% 1,480 2.1%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
31 70.5% 1,077 2.8%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
30 68.2% 1,101 2.7%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
29 65.9% 906 3.1%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
29 65.9% 1,876 1.5%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
27 61.4% 946 2.8%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
27 61.4% 1,536 1.7%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
26 59.1% 1,327 1.9%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
25 56.8% 677 3.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/12/2019Craddick, Tom (The Honorable)$100.00Charitable donation
05/08/2017Duncan, Robert L. (The Honorable)$500.00charitable contribution
03/01/2016Hunter, Todd A. (The Honorable)$56.50Event sponsorship
04/28/2015Hunter, Todd A. (The Honorable)$600.00Event sponsorship
05/14/2014Workman for Texas$1,000.00Office Holder donation
05/13/2014Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,750.00Event sponsorship
01/20/2014Van de Putte, Leticia (Mrs.)$100.00donation
11/29/2013Jackson, James M. (Mr.)$500.00Donation
09/27/2013Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,100.00Event sponsorship
08/06/2013TRI-COUNTY REPUBLICAN WOMEN$50.00DONATION
07/23/2013Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,500.00Event sponsorship
11/01/2012MORRISON, GEANIE W.$150.00DONATION
10/11/2012Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,000.00Contribution
10/01/2012Rodriguez, Eduardo$82.00campaign storage
09/19/2012Rangel, Ronald (The Honorable)$20.00Donation
08/31/2012Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$2,500.00Event tickets
05/30/2012South Texas Republicans$6.00Donation
01/04/2012Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,000.00Contribution for campaign purpose.
12/29/2011FLORES, JOSE ROBERTO (Mr.)$100.00Donation
11/28/2011Hunter, Todd (Mr.)$1,000.00Event sponsorship for campaign purpose.
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.