Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
John Garza Campaign
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 167827 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$214,599.08
Client Filers
38
Payments
92
Activity Range
07/16/2008–09/21/2016
Largest Payment
$20,000.00
Graph: 38 connected filers · 92 payments · $214,599.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- John Garza Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
29 | 76.3% | 325 | 8.7% |
|
LYLE LARSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 198693
|
28 | 73.7% | 196 | 13.6% |
|
SARAH DAVIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 276235
|
28 | 73.7% | 215 | 12.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
28 | 73.7% | 524 | 5.2% |
|
CONNIE SCOTT CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 73497
|
27 | 71.1% | 75 | 31.4% |
|
LARRY GONZALES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 186958
|
27 | 71.1% | 146 | 17.2% |
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
27 | 71.1% | 386 | 6.8% |
|
DOUG MILLER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 94575
|
26 | 68.4% | 114 | 20.6% |
|
BRIAN BIRDWELL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 42130
|
26 | 68.4% | 188 | 13.0% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
26 | 68.4% | 268 | 9.3% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
26 | 68.4% | 325 | 7.7% |
|
WAYNE CHRISTIAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 349851
|
25 | 65.8% | 127 | 17.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.