Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Infinity Consulting

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 156744 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$70,424.50
Client Filers
3
Payments
11
Activity Range
03/22/2024–08/22/2024
Largest Payment
$29,900.00
Graph: 3 connected filers · 11 payments · $70,424.50 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Little, Pamela M. (The Honorable)$31,500.00205/28/2024
2Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$20,400.00708/22/2024
3Richardson, Keresa (Mrs.)$18,524.50206/02/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
3 100.0% 1,368 0.2%
Collin County Republican Assembly
Vendor ID 69416
2 66.7% 5 33.3%
Mustang Strategies
Vendor ID 220399
2 66.7% 11 16.7%
McKinney CHamber of COmmerce
Vendor ID 208448
2 66.7% 21 9.1%
Republican Women of Greater North Texas
Vendor ID 262066
2 66.7% 38 5.1%
TEXAS TRADE GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 314354
2 66.7% 38 5.1%
FIRST GRAPHIC SERVICES INC.
Vendor ID 113316
2 66.7% 42 4.7%
Collin County Conservative Republicans
Vendor ID 69343
2 66.7% 43 4.5%
Plano Republican Women
Vendor ID 245907
2 66.7% 45 4.3%
CITI CARDS
Vendor ID 64109
2 66.7% 55 3.6%
GOLDEN CORRIDOR REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 130793
2 66.7% 102 1.9%
COLLIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 69423
2 66.7% 162 1.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
08/22/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$3,200.00Consulting Fee (Phone Bank)
08/02/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$2,000.00Consulting (Phone Bank)
07/15/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$2,000.00Consulting Expense (Phone Bank)
06/24/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$2,000.00Phone Banking
06/02/2024Richardson, Keresa (Mrs.)$8,785.50Phone calls
05/29/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$7,200.00Phone Banking
05/28/2024Little, Pamela M. (The Honorable)$29,900.00Calls
05/28/2024Little, Pamela M. (The Honorable)$1,600.00Poll Greeters
05/23/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$500.00Phone Banking
05/22/2024Laseter, Kimberly M. (Mrs.)$3,500.00Phone Banking
03/22/2024Richardson, Keresa (Mrs.)$9,739.00Infinity consulting
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.