Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Hickory Street Storage
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 144826 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,640.00
Client Filers
2
Payments
24
Activity Range
12/01/2003–05/29/2015
Largest Payment
$650.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 24 payments · $10,640.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Hickory Street Storage
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denton County Democratic Club | $10,190.00 | 23 | 05/29/2015 |
| 2 | Denton County Democratic Party (CEC) | $450.00 | 1 | 05/28/2008 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Denton Municipal Utilities
Vendor ID 88851
|
2 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% |
|
G & L Jones
Vendor ID 124546
|
2 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% |
|
Weldon's
Vendor ID 350751
|
2 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% |
|
City of Denton Utilities
Vendor ID 65301
|
2 | 100.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
|
Denton Black Chamber of Commerce
Vendor ID 88659
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
Denton County
Vendor ID 88693
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
TROPHY HOUSE
Vendor ID 333949
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
SWASH LABS
Vendor ID 301722
|
2 | 100.0% | 14 | 14.3% |
|
Frontier Communications
Vendor ID 123435
|
2 | 100.0% | 21 | 9.5% |
|
US POST MASTER
Vendor ID 340250
|
2 | 100.0% | 29 | 6.9% |
|
DENTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 88715
|
2 | 100.0% | 61 | 3.3% |
|
LULAC
Vendor ID 197896
|
2 | 100.0% | 107 | 1.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2015 | Denton County Democratic Club | $95.00 | rent for storage unit |
| 11/21/2014 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | storage unit rent |
| 05/23/2014 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | extra storage |
| 11/08/2013 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | rent for storage unit |
| 06/01/2013 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | Storage Unit 6 mot rent |
| 11/30/2012 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | storage unit |
| 11/22/2011 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 05/20/2011 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 11/05/2010 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 06/01/2010 | Denton County Democratic Club | $650.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 11/18/2009 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 06/01/2009 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 12/01/2008 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 05/28/2008 | Denton County Democratic Party (CEC) | $450.00 | storage |
| 03/13/2008 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 06/01/2007 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 11/27/2006 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 05/15/2006 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 11/29/2005 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
| 06/01/2005 | Denton County Democratic Club | $450.00 | 6 mts rent for storage unit |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.