Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

SWASH LABS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Software Technology
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 301722 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$1,011,394.55
Client Filers
14
Payments
127
Activity Range
07/18/2011–06/07/2026
Largest Payment
$140,000.00
Graph: 14 connected filers · 127 payments · $1,011,394.55 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1First Tuesday$665,000.001210/23/2024
2Lone Star Project Nonfederal$182,825.872606/07/2026
3Fair Shot Texas PAC$75,426.872405/02/2023
4Brewer, Angela A. (Ms.)$17,000.00811/23/2020
5Case, Carl Bryan (Mr.)$16,000.001910/14/2011
6Skidonenko, Jennifer (Ms.)$12,200.00402/20/2020
7Denton County Democratic Party (CEC)$7,680.81507/26/2022
8Bell-Metereau, Rebecca (Dr.)$7,500.001210/25/2012
9Dixon, Paige Jeanie (Ms.)$7,500.00508/07/2019
10Committee For Public Safety, Fort Worth Police Officer's Association$7,500.00305/30/2013
11Burnam, Lon M.$5,550.00409/22/2011
12Ko, Ramey (Mr.)$3,825.00306/18/2013
13Denton County Democratic Club$2,320.00109/11/2020
14Taylor, Amy$1,066.00103/06/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
11 78.6% 1,669 0.7%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
8 57.1% 1,638 0.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
7 50.0% 1,958 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
7 50.0% 3,017 0.2%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
6 42.9% 592 1.0%
DENTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 88715
5 35.7% 61 7.1%
OFFICEMAX
Vendor ID 231066
5 35.7% 407 1.2%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
5 35.7% 620 0.8%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
5 35.7% 898 0.6%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
5 35.7% 1,045 0.5%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
5 35.7% 1,174 0.4%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
5 35.7% 1,368 0.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/07/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$8,680.00Digital Consulting
05/12/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Consulting
04/06/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$5,000.00Digital Consulting
04/06/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Consulting
03/06/2026Taylor, Amy$1,066.00Website Design
02/20/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$10,000.00Digital Media Buy Supporting Christina Whitfield-Sowells
02/20/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Media Buy
01/13/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$25,000.00In-Kind Digital Communications for Taylor Rehmet Campaign
01/13/2026Lone Star Project Nonfederal$17,450.00Digital Media Buy
09/29/2025Lone Star Project Nonfederal$4,340.00Digital Consulting
04/29/2025Lone Star Project Nonfederal$15,040.00Digital Ads
02/05/2025Lone Star Project Nonfederal$5,770.00Digital Ads
10/25/2024Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Consulting
10/25/2024Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Consulting
10/23/2024First Tuesday$17,500.00Digital Media Consulting Services
10/21/2024First Tuesday$100,000.00Media Buy
10/03/2024First Tuesday$140,000.00Media Buy
10/03/2024First Tuesday$17,500.00Digital Media Consulting Services
09/25/2024Lone Star Project Nonfederal$1,840.00Digital Consulting
09/11/2024Lone Star Project Nonfederal$3,755.00Digital Consulting
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.