Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
GRASSROOTS COMMANDOS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 133542 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$27,505.19
Client Filers
7
Payments
20
Activity Range
03/22/2012–04/29/2016
Largest Payment
$5,666.25
Graph: 7 connected filers · 20 payments · $27,505.19 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Grassroots Commandos
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1836 Pac | $22,087.28 | 10 | 04/29/2016 |
| 2 | Hall III, Robert L. (Mr.) | $3,694.52 | 1 | 06/26/2014 |
| 3 | Chen, Stacy (Ms.) | $640.10 | 3 | 01/30/2014 |
| 4 | Lawson, John (Mr.) | $598.74 | 2 | 11/05/2012 |
| 5 | Bounds, Linda (Mrs.) | $418.00 | 1 | 03/22/2012 |
| 6 | Delgado, Rachel (Mrs.) | $56.55 | 1 | 05/04/2012 |
| 7 | Whitehill, William G. (Mr.) | $10.00 | 2 | 04/28/2012 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
5 | 71.4% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
|
4 | 57.1% | 734 | 0.5% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
4 | 57.1% | 898 | 0.4% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
4 | 57.1% | 1,536 | 0.3% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
4 | 57.1% | 1,876 | 0.2% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,174 | 0.3% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,638 | 0.2% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,571 | 0.2% |
|
Lozano Enterprises
Vendor ID 196814
|
2 | 28.6% | 2 | 28.6% |
|
Rockwall Republican Mens Club
Vendor ID 267353
|
2 | 28.6% | 5 | 20.0% |
|
ROCKWALL COUNTY
Vendor ID 267223
|
2 | 28.6% | 7 | 16.7% |
|
Kaufman County GOP
Vendor ID 175110
|
2 | 28.6% | 10 | 13.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2016 | 1836 PAC | $787.17 | Phone Bank Support Services, Voter Data, Data Analysis, Electronic Equipment Fees |
| 03/02/2015 | 1836 PAC | $2,000.00 | Phone Bank Support Services, Voter Data, Data Analysis, Electronic Equipment Fees |
| 10/31/2014 | 1836 Pac | $5,666.25 | Block Walker Fees |
| 10/31/2014 | 1836 Pac | $2,811.90 | Robo Call Fees |
| 10/31/2014 | 1836 Pac | $2,377.50 | Fees for Block Walkers |
| 10/31/2014 | 1836 Pac | $393.48 | Office rental fees |
| 10/18/2014 | 1836 Pac | $2,377.50 | Paid Walkers and Phone Bankers |
| 10/18/2014 | 1836 Pac | $393.48 | Rental Expense for Office, Phones, etc |
| 10/10/2014 | 1836 Pac | $4,080.00 | Paid Walkers for Door to Door |
| 10/01/2014 | 1836 Pac | $1,200.00 | Rent paid on Call Center Space |
| 06/26/2014 | Hall III, Robert L. (Mr.) | $3,694.52 | Facebook ads and autodialer minutes |
| 01/30/2014 | Chen, Stacy (Ms.) | $200.00 | pushcards |
| 12/28/2013 | Chen, Stacy (Ms.) | $193.20 | White Bumper Stickers |
| 11/17/2013 | Chen, Stacy (Ms.) | $246.90 | Pushcards |
| 11/05/2012 | Lawson, John (Mr.) | $299.37 | CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING |
| 10/24/2012 | Lawson, John (Mr.) | $299.37 | AUTOMATIC CALLING SERVICES |
| 05/04/2012 | Delgado, Rachel (Mrs.) | $56.55 | Phone bank |
| 04/28/2012 | Whitehill, William G. (Mr.) | $5.00 | Voter information |
| 03/22/2012 | Bounds, Linda (Mrs.) | $418.00 | Voter Database Service |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.