Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
FORT BEND REPUBLICAN PARTY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 116327 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$286,939.22
Client Filers
53
Payments
169
Activity Range
10/19/2003–04/14/2026
Largest Payment
$15,000.00
Graph: 53 connected filers · 169 payments · $286,939.22 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Fort bend Republican Party
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
41 | 77.4% | 1,571 | 2.6% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
|
31 | 58.5% | 457 | 6.5% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
28 | 52.8% | 3,017 | 0.9% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
24 | 45.3% | 1,077 | 2.2% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
24 | 45.3% | 1,327 | 1.8% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
22 | 41.5% | 1,445 | 1.5% |
|
FORT BEND COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 116177
|
19 | 35.8% | 67 | 18.8% |
|
BRAZORIA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 41242
|
19 | 35.8% | 84 | 16.1% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
19 | 35.8% | 1,536 | 1.2% |
|
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
|
18 | 34.0% | 947 | 1.8% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
18 | 34.0% | 1,174 | 1.5% |
|
GALVESTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 125488
|
17 | 32.1% | 93 | 13.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2026 | Rogers, Stephen C. (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | Contribution to Fort Bend Republican Party. |
| 04/14/2026 | Texans for Dan Patrick | $2,500.00 | Fort Bend Lincoln Day Sponsorship |
| 04/08/2026 | Reddi, Kambam Asha (Ms.) | $10,000.00 | EXPENSES TOWARDS JUDICIAL CAMPAIGN |
| 04/06/2026 | Hanna, Mark H. | $10,000.00 | Campaign Event Sponsorship |
| 04/01/2026 | Rogers, Stephen C. (The Honorable) | $175.00 | Contribution to Fort Bend Republican Party. |
| 03/18/2026 | Fort Bend Republican Women's Club PAC | $2,500.00 | Purchase of table of (10) at the Lincoln Reagan Dinner. |
| 03/17/2026 | Fort Bend Republican Women's Club PAC | $2,500.00 | Purchased a table for (10) for the Lincoln Reagan Dinner. |
| 03/16/2026 | Hanna, Mark H. | $1,000.00 | Campaign Event Sponsorship |
| 12/31/2025 | Reddi, Kambam Asha (Ms.) | $1,500.00 | filing fee |
| 12/02/2025 | Hanna, Mark H. | $1,500.00 | Campaign Filing Fee |
| 12/01/2025 | Hanna, Mark H. | $45.00 | Republican Party Christmas Party |
| 12/01/2025 | Hanna, Mark H. | $45.00 | Campaign Event Expense |
| 11/19/2025 | Rogers, Stephen C. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Filing Fee. |
| 10/31/2025 | Rogers, Stephen C. (The Honorable) | $500.00 | Contribution. |
| 03/19/2025 | Antu, Maritza M. (Mrs.) | $300.00 | Lincoln Reagan Dinner. |
| 03/11/2025 | Texans for Joan Huffman | $2,500.00 | POLITICAL DONATION |
| 03/07/2025 | McLaughlin, Tonya (The Honorable) | $300.00 | Reagan Lincoln Dinner |
| 12/02/2024 | Armenta, Ben (Mr.) | $70.00 | Sponsorship for event. |
| 11/07/2024 | Armenta, Ben (Mr.) | $39.19 | Sponsorship of event. |
| 11/05/2024 | Antu, Maritza M. (Mrs.) | $6,000.00 | Joint Campaign Expenditure |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.