Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
GALVESTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 125488 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$482,910.60
Client Filers
93
Payments
361
Activity Range
02/14/2002–05/06/2026
Largest Payment
$15,000.00
Graph: 93 connected filers · 361 payments · $482,910.60 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- GALVESTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
61 | 65.6% | 3,017 | 2.0% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
60 | 64.5% | 1,571 | 3.7% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
|
47 | 50.5% | 457 | 9.3% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
43 | 46.2% | 1,077 | 3.8% |
|
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
|
38 | 40.9% | 584 | 5.9% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
37 | 39.8% | 1,327 | 2.7% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
36 | 38.7% | 1,174 | 2.9% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
36 | 38.7% | 1,445 | 2.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
36 | 38.7% | 1,480 | 2.3% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
36 | 38.7% | 1,638 | 2.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
35 | 37.6% | 1,958 | 1.7% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
32 | 34.4% | 1,876 | 1.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2026 | Middleton II, David M. (The Honorable) | $500.00 | campaign event sponsorship |
| 03/30/2026 | Ligon, Brett (The Honorable) | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 02/02/2026 | 30mm PAC | $500.00 | Event Sponsorship |
| 01/30/2026 | Watkins, Nathan E. (Mr.) | $7,250.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 01/23/2026 | Texans for Kelly Hancock SPAC | $225.00 | Ticket for candidate to attend GCRP Lincoln Reagan Dinner |
| 01/13/2026 | Gibson, Zachary (Mr.) | $150.00 | Ticket to Lincoln-Regan dinner in Galveston County. |
| 01/06/2026 | Texans for Kelly Hancock SPAC | $450.00 | Ticket for candidate to attend Lincoln Reagan Dinner |
| 01/06/2026 | Adams, Noel T. (The Honorable) | $234.69 | Ticket for Lincoln Reagan Dinner on January 30, 2026. |
| 12/17/2025 | Friends of Dr. Greg Bonnen | $1,500.00 | Donation /Sponsorship for Lincoln Reagan Dinner |
| 12/05/2025 | Jones, Louis J. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Election Filing Fee |
| 11/18/2025 | Grady, Patricia V. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Candidate Filing Fee |
| 11/08/2025 | Fisher, Emily A. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Election filing fee |
| 11/04/2025 | Friends of Dr. Greg Bonnen | $750.00 | Cashier's Check for State Representative filing fee Dr. Bonnen |
| 06/28/2025 | Grady, Patricia V. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Table Sponsorship |
| 06/28/2025 | Adams, Noel T. (The Honorable) | $182.60 | Attend Lincoln Reagan Dinner |
| 06/16/2025 | Hart, Bradley S. (The Honorable) | $125.00 | 2025 Lincoln Reagan Dinner ticket |
| 06/15/2025 | Hart, Bradley S. (The Honorable) | $125.00 | ticket to Lincoln Reagan Dinner |
| 05/20/2025 | 30mm PAC | $1,500.00 | Donation |
| 05/13/2025 | Friends of Dr. Greg Bonnen | $1,562.81 | Campaign Dinner expense |
| 04/08/2025 | Middleton II, David M. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Event Sponsorship |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.