Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
BOB HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 37945 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$300,600.00
Client Filers
34
Payments
70
Activity Range
04/11/2000–11/03/2006
Largest Payment
$50,000.00
Graph: 34 connected filers · 70 payments · $300,600.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Bob Hunter Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIKE JACKSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213615
|
30 | 88.2% | 162 | 18.1% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
30 | 88.2% | 187 | 15.7% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
30 | 88.2% | 227 | 13.0% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
30 | 88.2% | 325 | 9.1% |
|
JOHN OTTO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168163
|
29 | 85.3% | 158 | 17.8% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
29 | 85.3% | 230 | 12.3% |
|
JOHN WHITMIRE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168462
|
29 | 85.3% | 235 | 12.1% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
29 | 85.3% | 289 | 9.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
29 | 85.3% | 297 | 9.6% |
|
STEVE OGDEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 296724
|
28 | 82.4% | 126 | 21.2% |
|
CHUCK HOPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62632
|
28 | 82.4% | 172 | 15.7% |
|
JIM PITTS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165491
|
28 | 82.4% | 189 | 14.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2006 | Texas Physical Association Political Action Committee | $750.00 | General Campaign Contribution |
| 12/29/2005 | Friends of Bob Hunter | $50,000.00 | Contribution |
| 10/07/2005 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $2,500.00 | Bob Hunter STATE HOUSE 71st TX |
| 10/06/2005 | Texas Association of Builders HOMEPAC | $250.00 | contribution |
| 09/14/2005 | Q PAC | $2,000.00 | political contribution toward candidacy for office |
| 09/02/2005 | Friends of Bob Hunter | $35,000.00 | Contribution |
| 07/26/2005 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $250.00 | Bob Hunter STATE HOUSE 71st TX |
| 12/03/2004 | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Texas Civic Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Political contribution to support Republican candidate for State Representative Dist. 71. |
| 11/29/2004 | Texas Telephone Association Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/15/2004 | Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP Campaign Fund | $500.00 | Support re-election to Texas House of Representatives District 71 |
| 10/15/2004 | Texas Federation of Teachers Committee on Political Education | $500.00 | Officeholder/campaign support |
| 09/29/2004 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $150.00 | Bob Hunter STATE HOUSE 71st TX |
| 09/27/2004 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund for Effective Government | $1,000.00 | BOB HUNTER STATE HOUSE 71st TX |
| 08/03/2004 | Friends of Bob Hunter | $30,000.00 | Contribution |
| 05/24/2004 | Texas Chiropractic Association P.A.C. | $250.00 | Political Contribution |
| 03/29/2004 | Friends of Bob Hunter | $40,000.00 | Contribution |
| 03/12/2004 | Q PAC | $1,000.00 | 'Political Contribution toward Candidacy for Office |
| 03/08/2004 | NRA Political Victory Fund | $250.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 03/08/2004 | Texas Assn of Mortgage Brokers PAC | $150.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 03/04/2004 | Baker Botts Amicus Fund | $250.00 | Contribution-Primary. State Rep. District 71. |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.