Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

DIGITAL GAME CHANGERS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 90735 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$59,560.00
Client Filers
5
Payments
24
Activity Range
07/04/2015–11/04/2016
Largest Payment
$5,945.00
Graph: 5 connected filers · 24 payments · $59,560.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Shine, Hugh D. (The Honorable)$41,890.001411/04/2016
2Gooden, Lance C. (Mr.)$6,150.00311/09/2015
3Simpson, David P. (The Honorable)$4,530.00207/04/2015
4Weaver, Harry (Mr.)$3,990.00304/20/2016
5Rafferty, LeAnn K. (Mrs.)$3,000.00201/04/2016

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HILL COUNTRY SPRINGS
Vendor ID 145717
3 60.0% 148 2.0%
RAISE THE MONEY
Vendor ID 254694
3 60.0% 151 2.0%
TEXAS HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS
Vendor ID 312139
3 60.0% 228 1.3%
US POST OFFICE
Vendor ID 340255
3 60.0% 431 0.7%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
3 60.0% 906 0.3%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
3 60.0% 1,101 0.3%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
3 60.0% 1,638 0.2%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
3 60.0% 1,327 0.2%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
3 60.0% 1,571 0.2%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
3 60.0% 1,360 0.2%
Renfro Graphics
Vendor ID 259328
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
BLUEBONNET PUBLISHING
Vendor ID 37408
2 40.0% 7 20.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/04/2016Shine, Hugh D. (The Honorable)$1,000.00Media Consultant
10/14/2016Shine, Hugh D. (The Honorable)$2,000.00Media consultant
09/01/2016Shine, Hugh D. (The Honorable)$2,000.00Media consultant
08/04/2016Shine, Hugh D. (The Honorable)$3,000.00Media Consultant
04/20/2016Weaver, Harry (Mr.)$400.00Final invoice.
02/04/2016Weaver, Harry (Mr.)$3,090.00Internet Campaign Advertizing
01/13/2016Weaver, Harry (Mr.)$500.00Internet campaign advertising
11/09/2015Gooden, Lance C. (Mr.)$1,650.00CONSULTING AND WEBSITE COSTS
10/15/2015Gooden, Lance C. (Mr.)$1,500.00CONSULTING FEE
10/02/2015Shine, Hugh D. (Mr.)$5,945.00Media consulting
10/02/2015Gooden, Lance C. (Mr.)$3,000.00WEBSITE DEVELOPENT COST
09/15/2015Shine, Hugh D. (Mr.)$3,000.00Media consulting
08/17/2015Shine, Hugh D. (Mr.)$4,000.00Social media set-up, website design
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.