Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
AJ LOUDERBACK CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 8986 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$504,757.90
Client Filers
34
Payments
59
Activity Range
12/21/2023–06/11/2026
Largest Payment
$100,000.00
Graph: 34 connected filers · 59 payments · $504,757.90 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- AJ LOUDERBACK CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
26 | 76.5% | 325 | 7.8% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
25 | 73.5% | 239 | 10.1% |
|
JARED PATTERSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 162294
|
24 | 70.6% | 156 | 14.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
24 | 70.6% | 359 | 6.5% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
23 | 67.6% | 289 | 7.7% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
23 | 67.6% | 325 | 6.8% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
23 | 67.6% | 524 | 4.3% |
|
WILL METCALF CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 354293
|
22 | 64.7% | 167 | 12.3% |
|
DENNIS PAUL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88506
|
22 | 64.7% | 171 | 12.0% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
22 | 64.7% | 273 | 7.7% |
|
RAMON ROMERO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 255123
|
21 | 61.8% | 130 | 14.7% |
|
KEN KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176470
|
21 | 61.8% | 195 | 10.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2026 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 08/13/2026 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 07/16/2026 | Combined Law Enforcement Assns. Of Texas PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 06/11/2026 | Texas Sands PAC | $4,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/13/2026 | Beef PAC | $1,000.00 | TX/TX/House /District 30 Non-federal contr |
| 01/21/2026 | Physicians for Free Market Healthcare PAC | $10,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/20/2025 | Texas Society Of Anesthesiologists Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/17/2025 | Justice for Texas Victims | $10,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 08/19/2025 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $1,000.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUITON |
| 06/27/2025 | Texans United for a Conservative Majority PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 06/26/2025 | Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC | $25,000.00 | Campaign contribution. |
| 06/26/2025 | BNSF Railway Company RAILPAC | $500.00 | To Support Primary 2026 State House 30 TX |
| 06/25/2025 | Houston Police Retired Officers Association - P.A.C. | $500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 06/23/2025 | American Pharmacies Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/13/2024 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/12/2024 | BNSF Railway Company RAILPAC | $500.00 | To Support General 2024 State House 30 TX |
| 12/11/2024 | Texans for Reasonable Solutions PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/09/2024 | Combined Law Enforcement Assns. Of Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/04/2024 | Texas Association of Health Plans PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 12/02/2024 | Holland & Knight Texas PAC | $500.00 | House District District 30 |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.