Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
ACRES OF ANGELS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 6217 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$27,605.00
Client Filers
44
Payments
114
Activity Range
11/21/2009–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$1,000.00
Graph: 44 connected filers · 114 payments · $27,605.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- ACRES OF ANGELS
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
|
44 | 100.0% | 492 | 8.9% |
|
HOUSTON BLACK AMERICAN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 151365
|
33 | 75.0% | 177 | 17.6% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
28 | 63.6% | 1,669 | 1.7% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
28 | 63.6% | 3,017 | 0.9% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 140583
|
27 | 61.4% | 157 | 15.5% |
|
AREA 5 DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 19567
|
25 | 56.8% | 125 | 17.4% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
24 | 54.5% | 785 | 3.0% |
|
Johnston Campaigns
Vendor ID 168946
|
23 | 52.3% | 147 | 13.7% |
|
HOUSTON BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 151295
|
23 | 52.3% | 182 | 11.3% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
23 | 52.3% | 1,958 | 1.2% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
22 | 50.0% | 1,480 | 1.5% |
|
SOUTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 289825
|
21 | 47.7% | 75 | 21.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | Ward Johnson, Charlene (The Honorable) | $250.00 | donation |
| 03/06/2026 | Davis, Dedra (The Honorable) | $240.00 | Contribution to Acre of Angels |
| 02/10/2026 | Poissant, Margaret A. (The Honorable) | $100.00 | charitable donation |
| 12/26/2025 | Rogers, Dawn Deshea (The Honorable) | $100.00 | Donation for senior/children gift cards |
| 12/22/2025 | Roth, Donna (The Honorable) | $200.00 | donation |
| 12/11/2025 | Miller, Beau A. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | event sponsorship |
| 12/01/2025 | Miller, Beau A. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | event sponsorship |
| 11/01/2025 | Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Sponsorship of Boys 2 Men Summit event |
| 03/11/2025 | Roth, Donna (The Honorable) | $100.00 | donation |
| 03/02/2025 | Schechter, Lillie J. (Ms.) | $500.00 | community event sponsorship |
| 06/18/2024 | Roth, Donna (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Ice storm recovery for elderly |
| 06/04/2024 | Miller, Beau A. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | donation |
| 06/03/2024 | Phillips, Fredericka M. (The Honorable) | $500.00 | donation for seniors food drive |
| 05/29/2024 | Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable) | $100.00 | Donation |
| 03/19/2024 | Litton, Todd C. | $250.00 | Acres of Angels Diabetes Walk |
| 03/18/2024 | Peake, Sandra J. (The Honorable) | $150.00 | Diabetes luncheon |
| 03/13/2024 | Heath, Sonya L. (The Honorable) | $100.00 | Sponsor of 2024 Diabetis Walk |
| 02/14/2024 | Haynes, Gemayel L. | $1,000.00 | Food and Beverage for 2 Luncheons |
| 11/04/2023 | Maldonado, Julia A. (The Honorable) | $150.00 | support for the seniors |
| 05/10/2023 | Sandill, Ravi K. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | Event sponsorship |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.