Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Chase Bank N.A.

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Financial Services
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 58536 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$203,764.94
Client Filers
3
Payments
173
Activity Range
03/23/2006–06/18/2026
Largest Payment
$6,063.13
Graph: 3 connected filers · 173 payments · $203,764.94 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable)$193,886.5614306/18/2026
2Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund$9,866.382912/31/2009
3Republicans for Inclusion$12.00110/29/2010

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
3 100.0% 1,445 0.2%
Victory Text LLC
Vendor ID 344779
2 66.7% 13 14.3%
OMNI AUSTIN HOTEL DOWNTOWN
Vendor ID 232310
2 66.7% 23 8.3%
Campaign Advocacy Management Professionals
Vendor ID 49027
2 66.7% 25 7.7%
PARKING MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Vendor ID 238271
2 66.7% 25 7.7%
CHILI'S GRILL & BAR
Vendor ID 60900
2 66.7% 65 3.0%
Berry Communications
Vendor ID 31996
2 66.7% 70 2.8%
MATT'S EL RANCHO
Vendor ID 206266
2 66.7% 117 1.7%
RYAN DATA & RESEARCH
Vendor ID 271508
2 66.7% 126 1.6%
CHUY'S
Vendor ID 62861
2 66.7% 188 1.1%
HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Vendor ID 151457
2 66.7% 181 1.1%
QUORUM REPORT
Vendor ID 253390
2 66.7% 197 1.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.