Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

WPAI

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 357550 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$2,863,466.78
Client Filers
15
Payments
218
Activity Range
05/01/2017–07/18/2025
Largest Payment
$119,444.45
Graph: 15 connected filers · 218 payments · $2,863,466.78 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texans for Greg Abbott$2,141,607.9016807/14/2020
2Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$138,437.001407/18/2025
3Huffines, Donald B. (The Honorable)$106,610.00809/18/2018
4Texas Now PAC$98,000.00110/15/2020
5Empower Texans PAC$86,701.00204/16/2018
6Gohmert, Louis B. (The Honorable)$81,700.00207/05/2022
7Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$70,785.88704/29/2022
8Huffines, Phillip Wayne (Mr.)$38,000.00402/26/2018
9#PROJECTREDTX$30,000.00105/04/2018
10Flores, Cynthia A. (The Honorable)$23,300.00210/18/2018
11Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$21,500.00406/01/2020
12Texans for Kelly Hancock SPAC$16,600.00108/20/2018
13Pitts, James R. (Mr.)$5,000.00202/16/2020
14C Club$5,000.00107/17/2018
15Bell Jr., Cecil I. (The Honorable)$225.00102/09/2022

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
12 80.0% 3,017 0.4%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
11 73.3% 1,571 0.7%
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
9 60.0% 642 1.4%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
9 60.0% 734 1.2%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
9 60.0% 1,077 0.8%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
9 60.0% 1,368 0.7%
THOMAS GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 326641
8 53.3% 212 3.7%
Axiom Strategies
Vendor ID 25291
7 46.7% 88 7.3%
UBER
Vendor ID 337140
7 46.7% 421 1.6%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
7 46.7% 677 1.0%
STARBUCKS
Vendor ID 294631
7 46.7% 690 1.0%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
7 46.7% 906 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
07/18/2025Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$6,000.00Campaign consulting
11/03/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$825.00Data Consulting
10/26/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$10,000.00Campaign consulting
10/18/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$31,975.00Campaign consulting
10/12/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$700.00Campaign consulting
10/03/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$825.00Campaign consulting
08/31/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$6,212.00Campaign consulting
07/05/2022Gohmert, Louis B. (The Honorable)$40,850.00Polling Expense
06/03/2022Gohmert, Louis B. (The Honorable)$40,850.00Polling Expense
05/20/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$33,000.00Campaign Fundraising Services
04/29/2022Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$155.44POLLING MODEL
03/30/2022Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (The Honorable)$4,400.00Campaign consulting
02/24/2022Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$12,000.00POLLING
02/09/2022Bell Jr., Cecil I. (The Honorable)$225.00MONTHLY BONFIRE SUBSCRIPTION
02/02/2022Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$3,625.00SNAPSHOT STUDY
01/03/2022Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$18,100.00BENCHMARK SURVEY
12/14/2021Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$24,750.00POLLING
10/15/2020Texas Now PAC$98,000.00Survey/Polling
07/14/2020Texans for Greg Abbott$6,000.00Campaign services
07/10/2020Texans for Greg Abbott$6,000.00Campaign services
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.