Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

USPS.com Click-N-Ship

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Printing Mail
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 341085 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$30.70
Client Filers
2
Payments
2
Activity Range
12/29/2017–12/24/2020
Largest Payment
$21.50
Graph: 2 connected filers · 2 payments · $30.70 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texans for Dan Patrick$21.50112/29/2017
2Tarrant County Democratic Women's Club$9.20112/24/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
GORDON BOSWELL FLOWERS
Vendor ID 131969
2 100.0% 18 11.1%
REATA RESTAURANT
Vendor ID 257335
2 100.0% 56 3.6%
TOTAL WINE
Vendor ID 331079
2 100.0% 104 1.9%
PUBLIC STORAGE
Vendor ID 251709
2 100.0% 160 1.3%
APPLE STORE
Vendor ID 18867
2 100.0% 237 0.8%
UPS
Vendor ID 339638
2 100.0% 265 0.8%
GODADDY
Vendor ID 130494
2 100.0% 514 0.4%
CONSTANT CONTACT
Vendor ID 73952
2 100.0% 629 0.3%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
2 100.0% 734 0.3%
FROST BANK
Vendor ID 123488
2 100.0% 654 0.3%
GODADDY.COM
Vendor ID 130520
2 100.0% 652 0.3%
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
2 100.0% 734 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.