Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
USPS-Austin
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 341053 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$2,809.19
Client Filers
2
Payments
35
Activity Range
08/16/2017–06/29/2026
Largest Payment
$311.46
Graph: 2 connected filers · 35 payments · $2,809.19 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- USPS-Austin
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estes, Craig (The Honorable) | $1,678.50 | 14 | 02/13/2018 |
| 2 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $1,130.69 | 21 | 06/29/2026 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
El Arbol
Vendor ID 100516
|
2 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% |
|
Draft Pick
Vendor ID 95407
|
2 | 100.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
|
Texas A&M University System
Vendor ID 309227
|
2 | 100.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
|
EAGLE MART
Vendor ID 97397
|
2 | 100.0% | 5 | 40.0% |
|
UMI Sushi
Vendor ID 337528
|
2 | 100.0% | 5 | 40.0% |
|
Polkadots Cupcake Factory
Vendor ID 247007
|
2 | 100.0% | 8 | 25.0% |
|
SUTHERLAND'S
Vendor ID 301415
|
2 | 100.0% | 9 | 22.2% |
|
Restaurant Jezebel
Vendor ID 262459
|
2 | 100.0% | 10 | 20.0% |
|
HEY CUPCAKE
Vendor ID 144626
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
The Economist
Vendor ID 318477
|
2 | 100.0% | 12 | 16.7% |
|
AUSTIN CAKE BALL
Vendor ID 23352
|
2 | 100.0% | 13 | 15.4% |
|
CONGRESS AUSTIN
Vendor ID 73252
|
2 | 100.0% | 13 | 15.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2026 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $230.00 | PO Box renewal |
| 04/27/2026 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $12.90 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 01/27/2026 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $11.95 | Postage for packages to EDO/CCDO |
| 12/12/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $163.54 | Gift card/postage |
| 11/17/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $9.90 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 11/04/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $9.90 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 11/03/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $9.90 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 06/29/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $198.00 | PO Box renewal |
| 05/26/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $11.60 | Stamps |
| 04/19/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $8.95 | Postage |
| 04/01/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $8.95 | Postage |
| 02/15/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $8.95 | Postage |
| 01/13/2022 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $90.15 | Package/stamps to EDO |
| 12/09/2021 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $20.30 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 11/12/2021 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $8.70 | Postage for package to EDO |
| 06/30/2021 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $166.00 | PO Box renewal |
| 11/02/2020 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $7.75 | Postage expense |
| 10/02/2020 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $7.75 | Postage expense |
| 08/21/2020 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $7.75 | Postage expense |
| 07/01/2020 | Hinojosa, Juan (The Honorable) | $130.00 | PO box renewal |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.