Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Search/TEXAS MAJORITY PAC
Canonical Vendor

TEXAS MAJORITY PAC

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Organization
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 312623 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
View relationships →Reported names
Total Payments
$659,223.05
Client Filers
14
Payments
177
Activity Range
04/16/2023–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$58,400.25
Graph: 14 connected filers · 177 payments · $659,223.05 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$538,302.8316306/30/2026
2Women's Health and Safety PAC$58,400.25105/29/2025
3El Paso County Democratic Party (CEC)$25,000.00107/26/2024
4Boot Texas Republicans$16,137.50104/20/2023
5Dallas County Democrats PAC$9,029.36108/11/2025
6El Paso Democratic Unity PAC$5,420.71108/11/2025
7Harris County Democratic Party (CEC)$5,000.00101/01/2025
8Reeder, Karen E. (Ms.)$750.00111/12/2025
9Cameron County Democrats PAC$379.58108/11/2025
10Hidalgo County Democrats PAC$228.00108/14/2025
11Central Texas Democrats PAC$216.00108/11/2025
12Bexar County Democrats PAC$199.19108/11/2025
13Lathan, Roxanne (Mrs.)$109.63104/25/2026
14Lopez, Orlando (Mr.)$50.00206/24/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Amalgamated Bank
Vendor ID 13295
 9 64.3% 64 13.0%
INTUIT
Vendor ID 158144
 8 57.1% 294 2.7%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
 8 57.1% 620 1.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
 8 57.1% 1,958 0.4%
Payroll Data Processing
Vendor ID 240462
 7 50.0% 14 33.3%
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
Vendor ID 6397
 7 50.0% 195 3.5%
Texas Majority
Vendor ID 312619
 6 42.9% 7 40.0%
Longhorn Organizing Strategies
Vendor ID 194862
 6 42.9% 8 37.5%
MBA Consulting Group
Vendor ID 207059
 6 42.9% 19 22.2%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
 6 42.9% 1,174 0.5%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
 6 42.9% 1,876 0.3%
GDA Wins
Vendor ID 127007
 5 35.7% 8 29.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$3,360.26POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$13,531.07POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/24/2026Lopez, Orlando (Mr.)$25.00Purchased an event ticket
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$6,205.39POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$12,715.55POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$3,752.20POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$3,528.43POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$3,497.56POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$2,075.52POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$5,214.55POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$2,544.93POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$3,381.26POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/25/2026Lathan, Roxanne (Mrs.)$109.63I paid for gas to travel to the filming adv. in Houston.
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$2,566.88POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$6,012.56POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$2,615.96POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$1,742.38POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$6,393.71POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$3,711.52POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$3,471.55POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.