Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

TEXAS DEMOCRATIC WOMEN OF GALVESTON COUNTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 310858 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$18,130.33
Client Filers
21
Payments
105
Activity Range
06/10/2002–06/28/2026
Largest Payment
$1,815.07
Graph: 21 connected filers · 105 payments · $18,130.33 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$10,051.366506/28/2026
2Galveston County Democratic Party$3,183.97408/23/2022
3Thomas, Cheri C. (Ms.)$800.00309/06/2022
4Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable)$460.00512/07/2021
5Dollinger, Scot G. (Mr.)$450.00309/27/2019
6Rivas-Molloy, Veronica (Ms.)$410.00410/17/2020
7Garner, David$300.00306/29/2004
8Neighborhood Democrats of Galveston County$300.00106/16/2003
9Triana, Gisela D. (The Honorable)$275.00301/03/2020
10Hightower, Richard F. (The Honorable)$250.00108/09/2024
11Landau, Sarah Beth (The Honorable)$250.00108/20/2024
12Robinson, Jane L. (Ms.)$250.00110/17/2020
13Guerra, Amparo Yanez (Mrs.)$250.00110/16/2020
14Mallia, Wayne$240.00310/30/2003
15Dicely, Shannon A. (Mrs.)$220.00103/03/2026
16Cheng, Kathy (Ms.)$125.00111/29/2019
17Lindsey II, George J. (Mr.)$100.00107/25/2020
18Cornelio, Natalia M. (Ms.)$90.00111/29/2019
19Creedon, Michael J. (Mr.)$75.00109/07/2022
20Buzbee Sr., Anthony (Mr.)$25.00106/10/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
GALVESTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 125418
14 66.7% 71 17.9%
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
14 66.7% 492 2.8%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
14 66.7% 1,669 0.8%
AREA 5 DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 19567
12 57.1% 125 9.0%
BRAZORIA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 41179
11 52.4% 60 15.7%
SOUTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 289825
11 52.4% 75 12.9%
HOUSTON BLACK AMERICAN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 151365
11 52.4% 177 5.9%
BAY AREA DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT
Vendor ID 29045
10 47.6% 37 20.8%
FORT BEND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 116131
10 47.6% 59 14.3%
Johnston Campaigns
Vendor ID 168946
10 47.6% 147 6.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
10 47.6% 1,958 0.5%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
10 47.6% 3,017 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$19.21POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$299.66POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$163.26POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$43.22POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$93.15POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$72.03POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$28.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$148.87POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$49.94POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$365.84POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$72.03POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$34.57POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/08/2026ActBlue Texas$664.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/03/2026Dicely, Shannon A. (Mrs.)$220.00Sponsorship of Event
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$1,109.26POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/22/2026ActBlue Texas$609.88POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/15/2026ActBlue Texas$326.53POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.