Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT JUDGES
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 309640 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$64,575.17
Client Filers
111
Payments
243
Activity Range
07/01/2002–06/25/2026
Largest Payment
$5,001.06
Graph: 111 connected filers · 243 payments · $64,575.17 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT JUDGES
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS CENTER FOR THE JUDICIARY
Vendor ID 310161
|
88 | 79.3% | 460 | 18.2% |
|
STATE BAR OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 295203
|
81 | 73.0% | 418 | 18.1% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
70 | 63.1% | 3,017 | 2.3% |
|
TEXAS BAR FOUNDATION
Vendor ID 309779
|
62 | 55.9% | 273 | 19.3% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
60 | 54.1% | 1,174 | 4.9% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
59 | 53.2% | 1,876 | 3.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
55 | 49.5% | 1,958 | 2.7% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
51 | 45.9% | 1,077 | 4.5% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
51 | 45.9% | 1,445 | 3.4% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
51 | 45.9% | 1,669 | 2.9% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
49 | 44.1% | 1,480 | 3.2% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
46 | 41.4% | 1,174 | 3.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2026 | Navarrete, Diane Rosaura (The Honorable) | $51.75 | dues |
| 06/18/2026 | Smith, Benjamin Nelson (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Membership dues |
| 06/03/2026 | Kelly, Susan Neely (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Dues |
| 06/03/2026 | Russell, Kerry L. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Annual Dues 2025-2026 |
| 12/17/2025 | Jones, Louis J. (The Honorable) | $566.25 | TADJ Expense |
| 09/05/2025 | Cosby, Donald J. (The Honorable) | $50.00 | 2026 membership dues |
| 09/04/2025 | Rincones, Gloria M. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | registration fees |
| 09/03/2025 | Sanchez, David A. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | dues for the association |
| 08/21/2025 | Bennett, Edward A. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Texas judiciary organization |
| 08/11/2025 | Birmingham, Brandon T. (The Honorable) | $301.75 | Funds to TADJ lobbyist for legislative session 2025 and for membership fee. |
| 08/08/2025 | Birmingham, Brandon T. (The Honorable) | $255.75 | Membership fees including processing for the Texas Association of District Judges |
| 08/08/2025 | Kelly, Susan Neely (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Annual Dues |
| 06/02/2025 | Martinez, Elizabeth R. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Membership Dues |
| 06/02/2025 | Martinez, Elizabeth R. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Membership Dues |
| 05/31/2025 | Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Membership fee |
| 05/21/2025 | Roth, Donna (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | lobbyist for lege work |
| 04/08/2025 | Kocurek, Julie H. (The Honorable) | $1,029.00 | Donation |
| 04/08/2025 | Kocurek, Julie H. (The Honorable) | $51.75 | Dues 2025 |
| 03/25/2025 | Shuchart Esq., Lee Kathryn (The Honorable) | $500.00 | legislative work for courts |
| 03/24/2025 | Rincones, Gloria M. (The Honorable) | $1,029.00 | Donation |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.