Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
SUPREME COURT BENEVOLENCE FUND
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 300890 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$85,773.00
Client Filers
29
Payments
218
Activity Range
08/01/2000–05/15/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 29 connected filers · 218 payments · $85,773.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- SUPREME COURT BENEVOLENCE FUND
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
27 | 93.1% | 1,077 | 2.5% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
26 | 89.7% | 1,571 | 1.7% |
|
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
|
23 | 79.3% | 677 | 3.4% |
|
STATE BAR OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 295203
|
22 | 75.9% | 418 | 5.2% |
|
HEADLINERS CLUB
Vendor ID 141900
|
20 | 69.0% | 104 | 17.7% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
20 | 69.0% | 906 | 2.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
20 | 69.0% | 3,017 | 0.7% |
|
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
Vendor ID 14902
|
19 | 65.5% | 48 | 32.8% |
|
TEXAS SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Vendor ID 314095
|
18 | 62.1% | 68 | 22.8% |
|
FOUR SEASONS HOTEL
Vendor ID 117210
|
18 | 62.1% | 263 | 6.6% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
|
17 | 58.6% | 457 | 3.6% |
|
TEXAS LAWYER
Vendor ID 312396
|
16 | 55.2% | 55 | 23.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2026 | Sullivan, James P. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Supreme Court Benevolence Fund |
| 05/12/2026 | Bland, Jane N. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Donation to the Fund for: Coffee for the Court, Staff Dinners, Bereavement Flowers, etc. |
| 05/07/2026 | Huddle, Rebeca A. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Donation to Benevolence Fund |
| 04/20/2026 | Texans for Hawkins | $2,000.00 | Benevolence Fund Donation |
| 04/19/2026 | Busby, Justin B. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
| 04/06/2026 | Sullivan, James P. (The Honorable) | $325.00 | Contribution to Supreme Court Benevolence Fund |
| 12/19/2025 | Bland, Jane N. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Donations |
| 12/16/2025 | Huddle, Rebeca A. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Contribution |
| 12/15/2025 | Busby, Justin B. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Donation |
| 12/10/2025 | Sullivan, James P. (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Contribution to Supreme Court Benevolence Fund |
| 12/04/2025 | Blacklock, James D. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | Contribution to Court Benevolence Fund |
| 11/24/2025 | Texans for Hawkins | $500.00 | Benevolence Fund Donation |
| 11/21/2025 | Texans for Hawkins | $1,000.00 | Benevolence Fund Donation |
| 12/12/2024 | Blacklock, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Court Benevolence Fund |
| 12/01/2024 | Huddle, Rebeca A. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Fund for Food/Beverages |
| 11/10/2024 | Busby, Justin B. (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Donation |
| 10/06/2023 | Chief Justice Nathan Hecht Campaign | $3,000.00 | Donation |
| 10/04/2023 | Huddle, Rebeca A. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | Donation |
| 10/02/2023 | Blacklock, James D. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | Contribution to Court Benevolence Fund |
| 09/30/2023 | Busby, Justin B. (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | Donation |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.