Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
STEVE HILBIG CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 296629 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$32,970.00
Client Filers
16
Payments
37
Activity Range
03/01/2006–08/28/2014
Largest Payment
$4,000.00
Graph: 16 connected filers · 37 payments · $32,970.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- STEVE HILBIG CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
14 | 87.5% | 297 | 4.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
13 | 81.3% | 386 | 3.3% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
12 | 75.0% | 524 | 2.3% |
|
REBECCA SIMMONS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 257442
|
11 | 68.8% | 17 | 50.0% |
|
JUSTICE KAREN ANGELINI CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 172945
|
11 | 68.8% | 19 | 45.8% |
|
LYLE LARSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 198693
|
11 | 68.8% | 196 | 5.5% |
|
DAVID DEWHURST COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 85094
|
11 | 68.8% | 236 | 4.6% |
|
EDDIE LUCIO III CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 99220
|
10 | 62.5% | 150 | 6.4% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
10 | 62.5% | 222 | 4.4% |
|
GLENN HEGAR CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 129801
|
10 | 62.5% | 248 | 3.9% |
|
MARIALYN BARNARD CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 202862
|
9 | 56.3% | 16 | 39.1% |
|
JUSTICE REBECCA SIMMONS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 173085
|
9 | 56.3% | 21 | 32.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.