Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

STATE HOUSE APARTMENTS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Travel Hospitality
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 295332 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$302,041.82
Client Filers
7
Payments
241
Activity Range
09/05/2000–12/18/2013
Largest Payment
$10,050.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 241 payments · $302,041.82 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Otto, John$146,107.6016512/18/2013
2Madla, Frank$79,017.622003/16/2006
3Fraser for Texas Senate$42,817.141510/30/2008
4Madden, Jerry A. (The Honorable)$25,371.242901/06/2009
5Lewis, Tryon (Mr.)$4,971.70706/02/2009
6Menendez, Jose$3,282.52402/18/2005
7Hodge, Gladys E.$474.00107/01/2003

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
7 100.0% 677 1.0%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
7 100.0% 1,077 0.6%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
7 100.0% 1,327 0.5%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
6 85.7% 355 1.7%
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
6 85.7% 393 1.5%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
6 85.7% 390 1.5%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
6 85.7% 906 0.7%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
6 85.7% 1,174 0.5%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
6 85.7% 1,368 0.4%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
6 85.7% 1,876 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
6 85.7% 3,017 0.2%
OMNI HOTEL
Vendor ID 232416
5 71.4% 326 1.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/18/2013Otto, John$58.83Water bill for Austin apartment
11/25/2013Otto, John$2,005.00December apartment rent in Austin
11/25/2013Otto, John$57.16Water for Austin apartment
10/24/2013Otto, John$2,005.00November apartment rent in Austin
10/24/2013Otto, John$58.73Water for Austin apartment
09/25/2013Otto, John$2,005.00October apartment rent in Austin
09/25/2013Otto, John$57.37Water for Austin apartment
08/26/2013Otto, John$2,005.00September apartment rent in Austin
08/26/2013Otto, John$57.65Water for Austin apartment
07/24/2013Otto, John$2,005.00August apartment rent in Austin
07/24/2013Otto, John$58.56Water for Austin apartment
06/22/2013Otto, John$2,005.00Austin apartment rent for July
06/22/2013Otto, John$59.57Austin apartment water bill
05/29/2013Otto, John$2,005.00Austin apartment rent for June
12/29/2012Otto, John$452.75Austin apartment rent for January 1st-7th
12/29/2012Otto, John$66.55Austin apartment water bill
11/26/2012Otto, John$1,787.00Austin apartment rent for December
11/26/2012Otto, John$64.94Austin apartment water bill
10/24/2012Otto, John$1,787.00Austin apartment rent for November
10/24/2012Otto, John$66.75Austin apartment water bill
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.