Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

SOUTHWEST PRECISION PRINTERS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Printing Mail
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 289923 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$239,267.24
Client Filers
16
Payments
165
Activity Range
03/04/2002–11/03/2015
Largest Payment
$16,823.10
Graph: 16 connected filers · 165 payments · $239,267.24 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1TEXANS FOR JOE NIXON$77,891.891004/27/2006
2Friends of Jim Murphy$51,386.016810/04/2010
3Friends of Kyle Janek$22,329.46706/16/2008
4Murphy, Jim$20,122.471510/27/2006
5Huberty, Dan$16,119.901701/14/2010
6Texans for John Davis$13,450.981410/13/2008
7Weber, Randy$9,542.671212/09/2008
8Houston Police Officers' Union$9,134.13103/04/2002
9Legler, Ken$8,869.84812/09/2008
10Zerwas, John M. (Dr.)$3,232.32303/09/2006
11Friends of Ken Legler$3,098.51310/14/2010
12Keel, Mary Lou (The Honorable)$1,928.56311/03/2015
13Citizens and Businesses for Safe Neighborhoods$818.00105/28/2004
14Friends of Austen Furse$587.99107/09/2008
15Hedges, Adele$469.81112/23/2005
16Cabaniss, Katherine$284.70109/10/2014

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Blakemore & Associates
Vendor ID 36318
13 81.3% 152 8.4%
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Vendor ID 214994
13 81.3% 377 3.4%
US POSTMASTER
Vendor ID 340396
13 81.3% 411 3.1%
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
13 81.3% 457 2.8%
Tribe Design
Vendor ID 333316
12 75.0% 54 20.7%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
12 75.0% 3,017 0.4%
SIGNATURE MEDIA SOLUTIONS
Vendor ID 284468
11 68.8% 46 21.6%
BISON SIGNS
Vendor ID 35481
10 62.5% 129 7.4%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
10 62.5% 906 1.1%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
10 62.5% 1,571 0.6%
Advarion Incorporated
Vendor ID 7656
9 56.3% 23 30.0%
CAMPAIGN DATA SYSTEMS
Vendor ID 49066
9 56.3% 39 19.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/03/2015Keel, Mary Lou (The Honorable)$1,136.17Campaign promotional items
10/19/2015Keel, Mary Lou (The Honorable)$503.36Campaign push cards
09/11/2015Keel, Mary Lou (The Honorable)$289.03Letterhead and envelopes
09/10/2014Cabaniss, Katherine$284.70Push Cards
10/14/2010Friends of Ken Legler$843.69Voter Contact Mail
10/04/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$898.79Voter Contact Mail
10/01/2010Friends of Ken Legler$1,090.13Voter Contact Mail
09/27/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$897.10Voter Contact Mail
09/24/2010Friends of Ken Legler$1,164.69Voter Contact Mail
09/20/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$1,641.31Voter Contact Mail
09/17/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$1,148.90Voter Contact Mail
09/17/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$1,009.62Voter Contact Mail
09/17/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$979.35Voter Contact Mail
09/14/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$990.46Voter Contact Mail
09/14/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$655.84Voter Contact Mail
09/13/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$341.23Voter Contact Mail
09/08/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$479.73Voter Contact Mail
09/07/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$1,489.21Voter Contact Mail
09/03/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$694.81Voter Contact Mail
09/03/2010Friends of Jim Murphy$509.63Voter Contact Mail
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.