Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
SIGNATURE ASPEN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 284435 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$234,989.38
Client Filers
25
Payments
52
Activity Range
08/08/2014–06/09/2026
Largest Payment
$23,522.45
Graph: 25 connected filers · 52 payments · $234,989.38 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- SIGNATURE ASPEN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
16 | 64.0% | 3,017 | 0.5% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
12 | 48.0% | 1,876 | 0.6% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
11 | 44.0% | 1,480 | 0.7% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
11 | 44.0% | 1,669 | 0.7% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
|
9 | 36.0% | 492 | 1.8% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
9 | 36.0% | 785 | 1.1% |
|
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
|
9 | 36.0% | 947 | 0.9% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
9 | 36.0% | 1,101 | 0.8% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
9 | 36.0% | 1,077 | 0.8% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
9 | 36.0% | 1,045 | 0.8% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
9 | 36.0% | 1,174 | 0.8% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
9 | 36.0% | 1,368 | 0.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2026 | King, Nicole S. (Mrs.) | $251.77 | Printing |
| 03/31/2026 | Perez, Mary Ann G. (The Honorable) | $1,457.69 | High School Senior Certificates |
| 02/19/2026 | Ligon, Brett (The Honorable) | $3,730.54 | Campaign Voter Contact Mail |
| 02/19/2026 | Ligon, Brett (The Honorable) | $1,974.03 | Campaign Voter Contact Mail |
| 02/14/2026 | Republican Voters of Texas PAC | $8,072.86 | Postage |
| 02/12/2026 | Republican Voters of Texas PAC | $8,072.86 | Postage |
| 02/03/2026 | Republican Voters of Texas PAC | $8,072.86 | Postage |
| 05/27/2025 | Perez, Mary Ann G. (The Honorable) | $1,298.95 | High School Graduation Certificates |
| 04/17/2025 | Brazoria County Republican Party PAC | $18,890.52 | Voter Guide - May 3 election |
| 10/25/2024 | First Tuesday | $2,455.11 | Canvassing Literature |
| 10/23/2024 | Clear Creek Republican Women | $7,838.63 | Mailer layout for candidates |
| 10/18/2024 | North Shore Republican Women | $18,879.24 | Hispanic Mailer--Printing and mailing |
| 05/28/2024 | Texas AFT Committee on Political Education | $2,531.94 | printing expense then reimbursement to Zeph Capo |
| 02/19/2024 | Republican Voters of Texas PAC | $16,951.27 | postage for 61k voter guides |
| 02/16/2024 | Brazoria County Republican Party PAC | $23,522.45 | Primary voter guide printing and postage |
| 10/24/2023 | Texas AFT Committee on Political Education | $2,503.82 | Printing Expense |
| 10/24/2023 | Allen Barrow, Stacy | $97.85 | campaign banner |
| 10/03/2022 | Galveston County Republican Party County Executive Committee | $1,739.36 | Payment for Pushcards for GCRP |
| 09/19/2022 | Collier, Michael E. (Mr.) | $6,463.20 | Printing |
| 08/29/2022 | Tutt, Joshua K. (Mr.) | $438.18 | Print materials |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.