Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Rindy & Associates

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 264513 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$517,065.05
Client Filers
9
Payments
62
Activity Range
01/28/2002–10/20/2014
Largest Payment
$50,000.00
Graph: 9 connected filers · 62 payments · $517,065.05 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$147,038.55710/20/2014
2Kitchen, Ann$135,392.422811/18/2002
3Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$113,900.00511/01/2004
4Austin Police Association PAC$75,772.40806/16/2003
5Ellis, Daniel$16,668.60210/27/2004
6Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$14,039.34609/21/2012
7Hopson, Charles L.$7,695.30401/10/2003
8Coleman, Garnet (Mr.)$6,513.44110/01/2004
9House Democratic Campaign Committee$45.00109/27/2004

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
8 88.9% 1,368 0.6%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
8 88.9% 1,669 0.5%
Rindy Miller Media
Vendor ID 264526
6 66.7% 52 10.9%
TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vendor ID 312067
6 66.7% 388 1.5%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
6 66.7% 906 0.7%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
6 66.7% 3,017 0.2%
OPINION ANALYSTS
Vendor ID 233565
5 55.6% 100 4.8%
HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS
Vendor ID 150890
5 55.6% 102 4.7%
LEGISLATIVE STUDY GROUP
Vendor ID 189739
5 55.6% 198 2.5%
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
5 55.6% 393 1.3%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
5 55.6% 390 1.3%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
5 55.6% 564 0.9%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/20/2014Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$13,953.78In-Kind; Mail Rep. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD # 117
10/14/2014Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$6,976.88In-kind; Direct Mail Rep. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD # 117
10/09/2014Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$28,221.67In-kind; Direct Mail Rep. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD # 117
10/06/2014Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$13,953.77In-Kind; Direct Mail Rep. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD # 117
10/02/2014Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$19,432.45In-Kind; Direct Mail Rep. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD # 117
10/25/2012Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$14,500.00In-Kind; Direct Mail Hon. Philip Cortez Campaign, HD# 117
09/21/2012Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$2,519.67Media consulting services
08/03/2012Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$2,500.00Media consulting services
05/25/2012Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$1,500.00Consulting Service
10/27/2011Cortez, Philip (Mr.)$2,500.00Campaign Services
11/01/2004Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$15,500.00Advertisement
10/29/2004Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$15,144.00Advertising
10/27/2004Ellis, Daniel$6,158.60Mail Piece
10/26/2004Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$50,000.00Advertising
10/26/2004Ellis, Daniel$10,510.00Mail piece
10/26/2004Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$5,000.00Advertising
10/25/2004Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.)$28,256.00Advertising
10/01/2004Coleman, Garnet (Mr.)$6,513.44Printing mail piece GOTV campaign
09/27/2004House Democratic Campaign Committee$45.00Design work for mail-out
06/16/2003Austin Police Association PAC$1,858.76recorded phone calls supporting Brewster McCracken for Place 5 Austin City Council
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.