Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Search/Rideshare2Vote
Canonical Vendor

Rideshare2Vote

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 264274 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
View relationships →Reported names
Total Payments
$7,901,285.23
Client Filers
22
Payments
548
Activity Range
10/05/2018–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$246,269.84
Graph: 22 connected filers · 548 payments · $7,901,285.23 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$4,106,565.6133406/30/2026
2Rideshare 2 Vote$3,727,266.5117406/30/2026
3Dallas County Democratic PAC - State & Local (CEC)$22,035.60602/28/2024
4Blue Horizon Texas PAC$14,042.51711/07/2023
5Represent Texas$6,500.00210/08/2024
6Sanchez, Lorenzo (Mr.)$4,500.00308/31/2020
7Sherrard, Dennis M. (Mr.)$3,000.00207/26/2022
8Goolsbee, Linda D. (Ms.)$3,000.00207/29/2022
9McKinney, Michelle D. (Ms.)$3,000.00210/21/2022
10The Black Women's PAC$2,125.00206/09/2023
11Scott, Tracy Y.$1,600.00308/30/2022
12Engelhart, Mike (The Honorable)$1,500.00108/19/2022
13Tarrant Texas Black Democrats PAC$1,500.00108/23/2022
14Bhojani, Salman (Mr.)$1,500.00109/08/2022
15King, Sheena L. (Ms.)$750.00108/24/2022
16Galveston County Democratic Party$500.00111/02/2022
17Preston Hollow Democrats Political Action Committee$500.00110/01/2020
18Bowers, Rhetta A. (Mrs.)$500.00111/02/2020
19Sims, Jeromey D. (Mr.)$350.00101/17/2020
20Brewer, Angela A. (Ms.)$250.00110/13/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
 16 72.7% 1,669 1.0%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
 15 68.2% 592 2.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
 15 68.2% 1,958 0.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
 12 54.5% 3,017 0.4%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
 11 50.0% 1,638 0.7%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
 10 45.5% 1,876 0.5%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
 9 40.9% 785 1.1%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
 9 40.9% 1,174 0.8%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
 9 40.9% 1,174 0.8%
Hustle Inc.
Vendor ID 153888
 8 36.4% 56 11.4%
NGP VAN
Vendor ID 225757
 8 36.4% 252 3.0%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
 8 36.4% 1,327 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$1,192.44POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$4,213.99POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$4,467.92POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$3,794.75POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$5,286.63POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$3,528.36POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$3,018.20POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$6,710.88POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$5,712.77POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$2,913.64POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$3,419.23POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$6,740.83POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$3,357.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$1,842.69POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$1,860.92POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$3,657.68POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$3,933.72POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$6,859.05POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/08/2026ActBlue Texas$16,372.70POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$7,102.47POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.