Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
RANDY WEBER CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 255639 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$103,800.00
Client Filers
56
Payments
114
Activity Range
11/06/2007–10/19/2012
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 56 connected filers · 114 payments · $103,800.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- RANDY WEBER CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
46 | 82.1% | 268 | 16.5% |
|
MIKE JACKSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213615
|
45 | 80.4% | 162 | 26.0% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
45 | 80.4% | 227 | 18.9% |
|
KEN LEGLER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176491
|
44 | 78.6% | 81 | 47.3% |
|
JOHN OTTO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168163
|
44 | 78.6% | 158 | 25.9% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
44 | 78.6% | 289 | 14.6% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
44 | 78.6% | 325 | 13.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
44 | 78.6% | 524 | 8.2% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
43 | 76.8% | 187 | 21.5% |
|
SARAH DAVIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 276235
|
43 | 76.8% | 215 | 18.9% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
43 | 76.8% | 230 | 17.7% |
|
GLENN HEGAR CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 129801
|
43 | 76.8% | 248 | 16.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2012 | Landry's Seafood Restaurants, Inc. General PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/27/2012 | Texas Air Conditioning Contractors PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 09/12/2012 | Ritter, Allan | $1,000.00 | Contribution |
| 10/03/2011 | Gulf States Toyota Inc. Texas State PAC | $250.00 | Contribution |
| 09/20/2011 | Texas Air Conditioning Contractors Association PAC | $1,000.00 | General Campaign Contribution |
| 08/30/2011 | Hartnett, Will | $500.00 | campaign contribution |
| 08/24/2011 | NRG ENERGY INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $1,000.00 | Randy Weber STATE HOUSE 29th TX |
| 08/23/2011 | Hartnett, Will | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 06/30/2011 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 29 (R) |
| 06/30/2011 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 29 (R) |
| 12/06/2010 | Haynes and Boone PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/02/2010 | Lyondell Chemical Company PAC | $500.00 | Desc:Direct Contribution |
| 12/02/2010 | Texas Chemical Council/Assn. Of Chemical Industry Of Texas Free Enterprise Political Action Cmte | $300.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/30/2010 | Texas Association of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign Contrib-HD 29 |
| 11/29/2010 | One Call Concepts PAC | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/29/2010 | Texas Association of Crane Owners Political Action Committee | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/23/2010 | American Pharmacy Coalition Inc. GPAC | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/22/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $2,500.00 | campaign contribution / HD 29 (R) |
| 11/22/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $2,500.00 | campaign contribution / HD 29 (R) |
| 11/15/2010 | Texas Chiropractic Association P.A.C. | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.