Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
AT&T Payment
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 22043 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$18,649.86
Client Filers
2
Payments
67
Activity Range
01/22/2019–06/18/2026
Largest Payment
$665.41
Graph: 2 connected filers · 67 payments · $18,649.86 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- AT&T Payment
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $18,473.43 | 66 | 06/18/2026 |
| 2 | Sherman Sr., Carl (Mr.) | $176.43 | 1 | 01/22/2019 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AT&T Executive Hotel
Vendor ID 21990
|
2 | 100.0% | 2 | 100.0% |
|
COA PARKING
Vendor ID 68041
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
UBER TRIP
Vendor ID 337194
|
2 | 100.0% | 14 | 14.3% |
|
CORT FURNITURE
Vendor ID 76034
|
2 | 100.0% | 36 | 5.6% |
|
LUBYS
Vendor ID 197301
|
2 | 100.0% | 36 | 5.6% |
|
ACE PARKING
Vendor ID 5857
|
2 | 100.0% | 98 | 2.0% |
|
DOORDASH
Vendor ID 93856
|
2 | 100.0% | 100 | 2.0% |
|
QT
Vendor ID 252298
|
2 | 100.0% | 107 | 1.9% |
|
EXPEDIA
Vendor ID 107638
|
2 | 100.0% | 145 | 1.4% |
|
LA QUINTA INN
Vendor ID 184301
|
2 | 100.0% | 140 | 1.4% |
|
STATE PRESERVATION BOARD
Vendor ID 295436
|
2 | 100.0% | 164 | 1.2% |
|
LUBY'S
Vendor ID 197228
|
2 | 100.0% | 189 | 1.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $298.81 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 06/08/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $208.15 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 05/14/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $411.51 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 05/08/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $509.21 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 04/07/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $291.15 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 03/18/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $328.54 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 03/09/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $80.41 | Campaign/Office Supplies |
| 02/18/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $133.05 | Monthly Fee |
| 02/09/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $342.30 | Monthly Fee |
| 02/06/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $110.73 | Monthly Fee |
| 01/20/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $152.89 | Monthly Fee |
| 01/07/2026 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $95.57 | Monthly Fee |
| 12/18/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $172.60 | Monthly Fee |
| 12/11/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $128.40 | Monthly Fee |
| 11/07/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $75.38 | Monthly Fee |
| 10/20/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $50.80 | Monthly Fee |
| 10/13/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $90.75 | Monthly Fee |
| 10/08/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $278.23 | Monthly Fee |
| 09/11/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $245.16 | Monthly Fee |
| 07/07/2025 | Campos, Elizabeth (The Honorable) | $420.42 | Monthly Fee |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.