Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

MPrints-Printing Inc

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 218751 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$10,597.21
Client Filers
4
Payments
15
Activity Range
10/10/2011–01/19/2026
Largest Payment
$3,445.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 15 payments · $10,597.21 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Bulldogs For A Better Future$6,890.00204/09/2025
2Spanko, Audrey M. (Mrs.)$1,863.57808/31/2020
3Wood County Republican Women$1,544.74301/19/2026
4Republican Women of Wood County$298.90209/08/2012

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
3 75.0% 1,174 0.3%
Ellison Insurance
Vendor ID 103738
2 50.0% 2 50.0%
Fusion In The Woods Catering
Vendor ID 124386
2 50.0% 2 50.0%
Vivant Ideas
Vendor ID 345999
2 50.0% 2 50.0%
Paladin Solutions
Vendor ID 236028
2 50.0% 3 40.0%
MINEOLA CIVIC CENTER
Vendor ID 214738
2 50.0% 4 33.3%
Mineola Chamber of Commerce
Vendor ID 214737
2 50.0% 8 20.0%
DESIGNER GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 89244
2 50.0% 316 0.6%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
2 50.0% 1,958 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.