Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Mosier View Property LLC

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 218197 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$26,554.88
Client Filers
2
Payments
10
Activity Range
10/16/2023–07/22/2024
Largest Payment
$3,621.12
Graph: 2 connected filers · 10 payments · $26,554.88 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Tarrant County GOP$22,933.76906/18/2024
2Tarrant County Republican Party (P)$3,621.12107/22/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Enovation Group
Vendor ID 104927
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
H/FW Capital Partners LLC
Vendor ID 137819
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
KVG Engineering
Vendor ID 182281
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
TCRP Victory Fund
Vendor ID 305932
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Southwest Office Systems
Vendor ID 289904
2 100.0% 4 50.0%
Birch Telecom
Vendor ID 35242
2 100.0% 8 25.0%
CFS Compliance
Vendor ID 57108
2 100.0% 8 25.0%
IRON MOUNTAIN
Vendor ID 158584
2 100.0% 13 15.4%
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES
Vendor ID 87576
2 100.0% 24 8.3%
Texas Bank
Vendor ID 309741
2 100.0% 34 5.9%
CLARKE AMERICAN
Vendor ID 66468
2 100.0% 64 3.1%
SPECTRUM
Vendor ID 290901
2 100.0% 165 1.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.