Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
ASPEN DESIGNS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 21391 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$88,174.38
Client Filers
57
Payments
293
Activity Range
04/21/2003–06/05/2026
Largest Payment
$5,483.34
Graph: 57 connected filers · 293 payments · $88,174.38 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- ASPEN DESIGNS
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
45 | 78.9% | 1,876 | 2.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
42 | 73.7% | 3,017 | 1.4% |
|
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
|
41 | 71.9% | 584 | 6.8% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
39 | 68.4% | 1,360 | 2.8% |
|
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
|
37 | 64.9% | 946 | 3.8% |
|
TFRW
Vendor ID 315057
|
34 | 59.6% | 259 | 12.1% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
33 | 57.9% | 1,327 | 2.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
31 | 54.4% | 1,480 | 2.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
31 | 54.4% | 1,958 | 1.6% |
|
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
|
29 | 50.9% | 734 | 3.8% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
28 | 49.1% | 1,445 | 1.9% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
27 | 47.4% | 898 | 2.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2026 | North Shore Republican Women | $220.59 | Purchased merchandise for Gift Table |
| 12/19/2025 | Coppell Republican Women's Club | $4,938.28 | Jewelry for resale |
| 03/14/2025 | Collin County Republican Party (CEC) | $53.09 | office supplies |
| 12/12/2024 | North Shore Republican Women | $45.95 | Merchandise for Gift Table |
| 10/15/2024 | Lost Pines Republican Women | $158.00 | Misc office expense |
| 07/01/2024 | Washington County Republican Women | $456.95 | WCRW Logo Pins for 2025 Memberships |
| 05/15/2024 | North Shore Republican Women | $153.12 | Merchandise for Gift Table |
| 03/11/2024 | North Shore Republican Women | $328.79 | Inventory for Gift Table |
| 03/06/2024 | North Shore Republican Women | $148.65 | Purchase merchandise for Gift Table |
| 10/23/2023 | Coppell Republican Women's Club | $5,483.34 | Jewelry for convention |
| 06/30/2023 | Smith County Republican Women's Club PAC | $93.30 | Bling Donations |
| 05/17/2023 | North Shore Republican Women | $62.89 | Items for Gift Table |
| 04/19/2023 | North Shore Republican Women | $104.94 | Gift Table Merchandise |
| 04/05/2023 | North Shore Republican Women | $230.47 | Gift Table Merchandise |
| 12/11/2022 | North Shore Republican Women | $63.79 | Merchandise to sell at the gift table |
| 11/01/2022 | McLennan County Republican Women PAC | $132.61 | Veteran Pins presented at the November Luncheon |
| 08/22/2022 | Republican Women's Club of Katy, PAC | $236.45 | Activism Awards |
| 06/17/2022 | Lubbock Area Republican Women PAC | $32.00 | Give aways at general meetings |
| 05/07/2022 | North Shore Republican Women | $90.85 | Resupply of merchandise for gift table |
| 04/08/2022 | North Shore Republican Women | $221.51 | Gift table merchandise |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.