Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Message Audience & Presentation Inc.

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Media Advertising
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 210665 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$1,385,044.96
Client Filers
17
Payments
138
Activity Range
07/30/2003–02/23/2024
Largest Payment
$69,170.00
Graph: 17 connected filers · 138 payments · $1,385,044.96 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Party$498,715.801711/19/2010
2Gonzales, Veronica (Ms.)$200,579.404110/22/2010
3Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$179,567.041702/17/2020
4Miller, Harriet (Mrs.)$121,089.711011/28/2006
5Dallas County Democratic Party$86,031.84210/31/2006
6Haldenwang, Loretta (Ms.)$71,215.96911/18/2010
7Johnson, Julie (Ms.)$63,690.60403/20/2018
8Annie's List$42,106.591201/20/2011
9Annello, Alexsandra R. (Mrs.)$41,852.60602/23/2024
10Jones, Aurora Martinez (Mrs.)$21,965.72404/09/2018
11Markowitz, Elizabeth A. (Ms.)$13,404.09108/18/2020
12Rodriguez Jr., Ricardo (Mr.)$11,611.89210/28/2005
13Puente, Robert (Mr.)$10,173.79111/15/2004
14Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas Action Fund Inc. PAC$8,006.91610/21/2004
15Woodward, Martin$7,362.77212/30/2004
16Patterson, Jan$5,549.25207/01/2004
17Texans Against Proposition 12$2,121.00207/30/2003

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
13 76.5% 1,669 0.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
13 76.5% 3,017 0.4%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
11 64.7% 1,174 0.9%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
9 52.9% 1,536 0.6%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
8 47.1% 1,045 0.8%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
8 47.1% 1,077 0.7%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
8 47.1% 1,368 0.6%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
8 47.1% 1,958 0.4%
CENTRAL MARKET
Vendor ID 56492
7 41.2% 484 1.4%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
7 41.2% 564 1.2%
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
7 41.2% 734 0.9%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 41.2% 1,101 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
05/28/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,400.00Social boosting and runoff hub
05/26/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,455.00Digital ad production
05/26/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,131.84Literature
05/21/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$10,000.00Digital ads
05/21/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$5,927.86Literature
05/18/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,341.88Mail
05/13/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$30,000.00Digital ads
05/12/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,361.55Mail
05/08/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,500.85Mail
04/30/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$6,087.12Mail
02/24/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$16,832.46Mail
02/24/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,675.00Digital ad production
02/19/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$25,000.00Digital ads
02/17/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$21,800.74Mail
02/05/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$25,000.00Digital ads
02/04/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$23,316.84Mail
02/01/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$24,755.88Mail
03/03/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$7,850.00Mail
02/25/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$1,497.19Campaign Literature
02/23/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$24,552.41Mail
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.