Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Message Audience & Presentation

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 210662 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$7,607,842.53
Client Filers
65
Payments
692
Activity Range
01/20/2000–05/28/2026
Largest Payment
$116,158.10
Graph: 65 connected filers · 692 payments · $7,607,842.53 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texans for Insurance Reform$1,672,680.0216105/19/2014
2Uresti, Carlos I. (Mr.)$1,554,350.655403/14/2007
3Texas Democratic Party$1,001,330.674311/02/2006
4House Democratic Campaign Committee$411,045.272411/05/2010
5Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$400,460.482205/28/2026
6Hinojosa, Juan J.$331,909.283603/20/2012
7Chavez-Thompson, Linda (Mrs.)$184,954.241611/10/2010
8Bolton, Valinda (Ms.)$171,706.002711/07/2008
9Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.)$170,620.68803/05/2010
10Miklos, Robert (Mr.)$170,034.482311/04/2010
11Travis County Democratic Party$144,441.481610/29/2020
12Yanez, Linda$103,523.291111/06/2008
13Lucido, Rita$77,221.89412/19/2014
14Olivo, Dora F. (The Honorable)$68,168.202505/02/2010
15Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$64,686.90603/03/2022
16Blue Texas$60,000.00210/10/2008
17Lengefeld, David F. (The Honorable)$58,120.721211/13/2000
18Sage, Karen (Mrs.)$57,416.61910/07/2010
19Jordan, James R. (The Honorable)$49,513.382007/11/2009
20Nelson, Arthur Cisneros (Mr.)$48,056.00311/01/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
53 81.5% 1,669 3.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
51 78.5% 3,017 1.7%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
37 56.9% 1,327 2.7%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
36 55.4% 906 3.9%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
36 55.4% 1,480 2.4%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
34 52.3% 1,077 3.1%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
33 50.8% 1,368 2.4%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
32 49.2% 1,101 2.8%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
32 49.2% 1,174 2.7%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
31 47.7% 1,536 2.0%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
28 43.1% 564 4.7%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
28 43.1% 1,360 2.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
05/28/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,400.00Social boosting and runoff hub
05/26/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,455.00Digital ad production
05/26/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,131.84Literature
05/21/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$10,000.00Digital ads
05/21/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$5,927.86Literature
05/18/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,341.88Mail
05/13/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$30,000.00Digital ads
05/12/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,361.55Mail
05/08/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$19,500.85Mail
04/30/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$6,087.12Mail
02/24/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$16,832.46Mail
02/24/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$8,675.00Digital ad production
02/19/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$25,000.00Digital ads
02/17/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$21,800.74Mail
02/05/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$25,000.00Digital ads
02/04/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$23,316.84Mail
02/01/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$24,755.88Mail
03/03/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$7,850.00Mail
02/25/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$1,497.19Campaign Literature
02/23/2022Eiserloh, Laurie (Ms.)$24,552.41Mail
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.