Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Magnolia Lakes

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 200375 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$15,241.41
Client Filers
3
Payments
23
Activity Range
10/19/2004–09/09/2014
Largest Payment
$2,429.15
Graph: 3 connected filers · 23 payments · $15,241.41 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Republican Party of Walker County$13,328.161702/24/2012
2Walker County Rupublican Women$1,602.00409/09/2014
3Walker County Democrat Club$311.25210/21/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
City of Huntsville
Vendor ID 65485
3 100.0% 6 50.0%
Eagle Graphics
Vendor ID 97365
3 100.0% 8 37.5%
Texas Prison Museum
Vendor ID 313091
3 100.0% 8 37.5%
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY
Vendor ID 273447
3 100.0% 32 9.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
3 100.0% 3,017 0.1%
Bennie J's Smoke Pit LLC
Vendor ID 31637
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Elkins Lake Recreation Corporation
Vendor ID 103460
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Heart of Texas Real Estate
Vendor ID 142164
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Huntsville Downtown Business Alliance
Vendor ID 153759
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Murski's Cafe
Vendor ID 220195
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Political Science Junior Fellows
Vendor ID 246856
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
SHSU College Republicans
Vendor ID 283803
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
09/09/2014Walker County Rupublican Women$862.50Facility rental for Round Up
08/15/2014Walker County Rupublican Women$226.00Food for lunch meeting
07/29/2014Walker County Rupublican Women$226.00Rented space for meeting
07/14/2014Walker County Rupublican Women$287.50Downpayment on rental of facility for fundraiser
02/24/2012Republican Party of Walker County$2,429.15Reagan Dinner - facilty rental fee for annual event
01/28/2012Republican Party of Walker County$100.00Reagan Dinner - facilty rental deposit
02/06/2011Republican Party of Walker County$1,840.65Facility rental for annual Reagan Dinner
01/10/2011Republican Party of Walker County$312.50Deposit for facility rental for annual Reagan Dinner
02/26/2010Republican Party of Walker County$2,107.20Facility rental for 2010 Reagan Dinner
01/06/2010Republican Party of Walker County$100.00Facility rental deposit for 2010 Reagan Dinner
02/19/2009Republican Party of Walker County$1,164.72Facility rental fee for Reagan Dinner
02/22/2008Republican Party of Walker County$1,152.00Facility rental fee for Reagan Dinner
07/05/2007Republican Party of Walker County$200.00Facility rental fee for Ice Cream Social
02/27/2007Republican Party of Walker County$1,015.72Facility rental fee for 2007 Reagan Dinner
01/01/2007Republican Party of Walker County$195.00Facility rental fee (deposit) for 2007 Reagan Dinner
10/21/2006Walker County Democrat Club$211.25Wine Tasting Fundraiser Expense
05/30/2006Walker County Democrat Club$100.00Deposit for Fundraiser Location
02/24/2006Republican Party of Walker County$1,011.22Facility rental fee for 2006 Reagan Dinner
11/14/2005Republican Party of Walker County$100.00Facility rental fee for 2006 Reagan Dinner
02/25/2005Republican Party of Walker County$500.00Facility rental fee for Reagan Dinner
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.