Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

LOS MISMOS RESTAURANT

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 195647 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$1,549.08
Client Filers
4
Payments
46
Activity Range
09/17/2005–12/02/2016
Largest Payment
$120.06
Graph: 4 connected filers · 46 payments · $1,549.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Lucio III, Eduardo A. (The Honorable)$1,193.203312/02/2016
2Lucio Jr., Eduardo$319.071103/17/2012
3Oliveira, Rene O. (Mr.)$21.06110/24/2013
4Euresti, Benjamin$15.75107/07/2008

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Armando Villalobos Campaign
Vendor ID 20135
4 100.0% 5 80.0%
BROWNSVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Vendor ID 43664
4 100.0% 6 66.7%
Taquito Express
Vendor ID 304330
4 100.0% 6 66.7%
BROWNSVILLE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 43710
4 100.0% 7 57.1%
VALLEY INTERNATIONAL COUNTRY CLUB
Vendor ID 342358
4 100.0% 7 57.1%
Camille Playhouse
Vendor ID 48868
4 100.0% 9 44.4%
LOUIE'S BACKYARD
Vendor ID 195932
4 100.0% 9 44.4%
St. Joseph Academy
Vendor ID 293079
4 100.0% 9 44.4%
ANTONIO'S MEXICAN VILLAGE
Vendor ID 18383
4 100.0% 10 40.0%
BROWNSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Vendor ID 43704
4 100.0% 10 40.0%
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHEDRAL
Vendor ID 155971
4 100.0% 10 40.0%
JONES LIQUOR
Vendor ID 169286
4 100.0% 10 40.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/02/2016Lucio III, Eduardo A. (The Honorable)$120.06Lunch meeting with local officials to discuss legislative issues.
10/24/2013Oliveira, Rene O. (Mr.)$21.06Breakfast with constituents.
12/03/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$48.05Breakfast meeting with District staff.
11/08/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$96.64Breakfast meeting with Campaign staff.
11/06/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$69.84Breakfast meeting with Campaign staff.
11/01/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$56.72Breakfast meeting with Campaign staff.
10/29/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$40.88Meal for campaign staff.
10/26/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$45.39Meal for campaign staff.
10/19/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$73.65Meal for campaign staff.
10/17/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$40.92Breakfast meeting with District staff.
10/09/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$77.36Meal for campaign staff.
10/09/2012Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$65.97Breakfast meeting with District staff.
03/17/2012Lucio Jr., Eduardo$17.90MEETING WITH CONSTITUTENTS TO DISCUSS LOCAL ISSUES
08/19/2011Lucio Jr., Eduardo$17.35MEETING WITH CONSTITUTENTS TO DISCUSS LOCAL ISSUES
11/10/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$17.65Breakfast meeting with officials to discuss legislative issues.
10/29/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$12.82Breakfast meeting with officials to discuss legislative issues.
09/20/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$27.99Breakfast meeting with officials to discuss legislative issues.
08/25/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$39.27Breakfast meeting with officials to discuss legislative issues.
07/22/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$11.72Breakfast meeting with local officials to discuss legislative issues.
06/23/2010Lucio III, Eduardo A. (Mr.)$23.07Breakfast with local officals
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.