Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Lilly & Company
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 191676 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$8,887,561.33
Client Filers
126
Payments
2,310
Activity Range
03/17/2000–06/15/2026
Largest Payment
$68,839.07
Graph: 126 connected filers · 2,310 payments · $8,887,561.33 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Lilly & Company
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
97 | 77.0% | 1,571 | 6.1% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
87 | 69.0% | 3,017 | 2.8% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
74 | 58.7% | 1,077 | 6.6% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
65 | 51.6% | 906 | 6.7% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
63 | 50.0% | 1,101 | 5.4% |
|
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
|
61 | 48.4% | 677 | 8.2% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
61 | 48.4% | 1,327 | 4.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
61 | 48.4% | 1,480 | 3.9% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
59 | 46.8% | 1,174 | 4.8% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
58 | 46.0% | 1,876 | 3.0% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
57 | 45.2% | 1,445 | 3.8% |
|
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
|
54 | 42.9% | 584 | 8.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2026 | Chief Justice Scott Brister Campaign | $2,500.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 06/14/2026 | Farris, April L. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | Fundraising consulting |
| 06/14/2026 | Farris, April L. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | Fundraising consulting |
| 06/09/2026 | Buckingham M.D., Dawn C. (The Honorable) | $5,440.00 | Fundraising retainer fee |
| 06/01/2026 | Texans for Hawkins | $5,000.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 05/15/2026 | Chief Justice Scott Brister Campaign | $2,500.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 05/11/2026 | Farris, April L. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | Fundraising consulting |
| 05/11/2026 | Farris, April L. (The Honorable) | $98.40 | fundraising mail |
| 05/05/2026 | Texas Bankers Association Bankers PAC | $4,000.00 | Solicitable class fundraising services |
| 05/04/2026 | Buckingham M.D., Dawn C. (The Honorable) | $5,020.00 | Fundraising retainer fee |
| 05/01/2026 | Texans for Hawkins | $5,042.90 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 04/16/2026 | Texas Bankers Association Bankers PAC | $4,000.00 | Solicitable class fundraising services |
| 04/15/2026 | Chief Justice Scott Brister Campaign | $2,500.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 04/10/2026 | Farris, April L. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | Fundraising consulting |
| 04/03/2026 | Buckingham M.D., Dawn C. (The Honorable) | $5,534.04 | Fundraising services |
| 04/03/2026 | Buckingham M.D., Dawn C. (The Honorable) | $5,044.00 | Fundraising services |
| 04/01/2026 | Texans for Hawkins | $5,000.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 03/16/2026 | Chief Justice Scott Brister Campaign | $2,500.00 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 03/10/2026 | Texas Bankers Association Bankers PAC | $4,000.00 | Solicitable class fundraising services |
| 03/09/2026 | Ashby, Trenton E. (The Honorable) | $3,500.00 | Campaign fundraising fee |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.