Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LHS Cheerleaders
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 190875 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$250.00
Client Filers
2
Payments
2
Activity Range
08/18/2006–09/08/2015
Largest Payment
$150.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 2 payments · $250.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- LHS Cheerleaders
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furlow, Philip Mack (Mr.) | $150.00 | 1 | 09/08/2015 |
| 2 | Napper, James J. (Mr.) | $100.00 | 1 | 08/18/2006 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Creative Inks
Vendor ID 78592
|
2 | 100.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
|
Dawson County Livestock Show
Vendor ID 85946
|
2 | 100.0% | 3 | 66.7% |
|
Lynn County News
Vendor ID 198780
|
2 | 100.0% | 16 | 12.5% |
|
Seminole Sentinel
Vendor ID 279155
|
2 | 100.0% | 19 | 10.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2015 | Furlow, Philip Mack (Mr.) | $150.00 | Football Ad |
| 08/18/2006 | Napper, James J. (Mr.) | $100.00 | Advertising |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.