Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
KYLE KACAL CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 182716 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$815,669.37
Client Filers
181
Payments
588
Activity Range
11/08/2011–12/09/2025
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 181 connected filers · 588 payments · $815,669.37 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- KYLE KACAL CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JOHN KUEMPEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167958
|
128 | 70.7% | 220 | 46.9% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
126 | 69.6% | 289 | 36.6% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
125 | 69.1% | 325 | 32.8% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
125 | 69.1% | 325 | 32.8% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
122 | 67.4% | 524 | 20.9% |
|
JOHN RANEY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168242
|
115 | 63.5% | 176 | 47.5% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
113 | 62.4% | 253 | 35.2% |
|
KEN KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176470
|
108 | 59.7% | 195 | 40.3% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
106 | 58.6% | 268 | 30.9% |
|
SARAH DAVIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 276235
|
104 | 57.5% | 215 | 35.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
104 | 57.5% | 359 | 23.9% |
|
LYLE LARSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 198693
|
103 | 56.9% | 196 | 37.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09/2025 | Schwertner, Charles (The Honorable) | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution. |
| 12/03/2025 | Williams, Thomas D. (Mr.) | $500.00 | campaign contribution |
| 11/06/2023 | Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association State PAC | $1,500.00 | Support for Texas House |
| 11/06/2023 | Texas Rural Water PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 11/06/2023 | Congress Avenue Partners Political Action Committee | $500.00 | political contribution |
| 10/26/2023 | Bryan Firefighters Association Political Action Committee | $3,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/26/2023 | Oncor Texas State Political Action Committee of Oncor Electric Delivery Administration Corp. | $1,500.00 | Political contribution |
| 10/25/2023 | A&M Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Committee Political Contribution |
| 10/23/2023 | Texas State Assn. Of Fire Fighters Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
| 10/23/2023 | Consulting Engineers PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/19/2023 | Texas Agricultural Cooperative Council PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/28/2023 | Texas Apartment Assn. PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/19/2023 | Vistra Employee State Political Action Committee of Vistra Corp. | $2,500.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 09/14/2023 | Focused Advocacy Political Action Committee (PAC) | $750.00 | Contribution-HD 12 |
| 09/14/2023 | Freese and Nichols PAC | $500.00 | Support Campaign |
| 09/13/2023 | HS LAW PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/12/2023 | IDS Engineering Group PAC | $250.00 | State Office |
| 08/29/2023 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $3,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 08/08/2023 | Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Political Contribution |
| 07/07/2023 | Texas Dairymen PAC | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.