Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
KSAT
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 181809 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$164,918.25
Client Filers
9
Payments
17
Activity Range
09/23/2004–10/21/2022
Largest Payment
$29,850.00
Graph: 9 connected filers · 17 payments · $164,918.25 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- KSAT
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Price, Richard E. (Mr.) | $41,100.00 | 4 | 10/11/2014 |
| 2 | Peden, Michael | $32,100.00 | 2 | 11/15/2006 |
| 3 | Gabriel, John | $27,116.00 | 2 | 09/23/2004 |
| 4 | Brown Jr. Jr., Joe Frazier (Mr.) | $23,248.50 | 3 | 10/14/2008 |
| 5 | Roman, Mary | $14,683.75 | 1 | 02/14/2008 |
| 6 | Judson Advancement for Children Committee | $9,000.00 | 1 | 10/21/2022 |
| 7 | Rangel, Ronald (Mr.) | $8,075.00 | 2 | 10/30/2008 |
| 8 | Torres, Tina (Ms.) | $7,565.00 | 1 | 10/18/2010 |
| 9 | Alvarez, Maria Luisa (The Honorable) | $2,030.00 | 1 | 10/17/2022 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAN ANTONIO BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 274302
|
8 | 88.9% | 68 | 11.6% |
|
ALLIED ADVERTISING
Vendor ID 11812
|
7 | 77.8% | 225 | 3.1% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
7 | 77.8% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 33267
|
6 | 66.7% | 184 | 3.2% |
|
BEXAR COUNTY TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 33417
|
5 | 55.6% | 45 | 10.2% |
|
LA PRENSA
Vendor ID 184192
|
5 | 55.6% | 104 | 4.6% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,101 | 0.5% |
|
BEXAR COUNTY YOUNG DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 33448
|
4 | 44.4% | 54 | 6.8% |
|
NORTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 228121
|
4 | 44.4% | 82 | 4.6% |
|
MONARCH TROPHY
Vendor ID 216664
|
4 | 44.4% | 94 | 4.0% |
|
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
|
4 | 44.4% | 390 | 1.0% |
|
STATE BAR OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 295203
|
4 | 44.4% | 418 | 0.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2022 | Judson Advancement for Children Committee | $9,000.00 | Digital advertisement |
| 10/17/2022 | Alvarez, Maria Luisa (The Honorable) | $2,030.00 | Digital advertising |
| 10/11/2014 | Price, Richard E. (Mr.) | $4,250.00 | Campaign Advertising Expense-Banner Ads |
| 10/18/2010 | Torres, Tina (Ms.) | $7,565.00 | Commercials |
| 10/30/2008 | Rangel, Ron (Mr.) | $3,060.00 | advertising - television commercials |
| 10/15/2008 | Rangel, Ronald (Mr.) | $5,015.00 | Advertising - television commercials |
| 10/14/2008 | Brown Jr. Jr., Joe Frazier (Mr.) | $8,628.00 | television advertising |
| 04/04/2008 | Brown Jr. Jr., Joe Frazier (Mr.) | $5,992.50 | Television Advertisement |
| 02/14/2008 | Roman, Mary | $14,683.75 | Advertising |
| 11/15/2006 | Peden, Michael | $2,250.00 | Balance on TV Commercial Time |
| 10/20/2006 | Price, Richard E. (Mr.) | $12,580.00 | Campaign Advertising Expense |
| 10/17/2006 | Price, Richard E. (Mr.) | $4,040.00 | Campaign Advertising Expense |
| 09/29/2006 | Price, Richard E. (Mr.) | $20,230.00 | Campaign Advertising Expense |
| 09/18/2006 | Peden, Michael | $29,850.00 | TV Commercial Time |
| 09/23/2004 | Gabriel, John | $13,558.00 | Advertisement |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.