Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

KML Consulting Inc.

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 180236 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$82,500.00
Client Filers
2
Payments
9
Activity Range
10/01/2009–02/02/2010
Largest Payment
$15,000.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 9 payments · $82,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Shami, Farouk$52,500.00702/02/2010
2Farouk for Governor Exploratory Committee$30,000.00211/02/2009

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
A Ambassador Limousine
Vendor ID 3212
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Aref LLC
Vendor ID 19604
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Balloon Masters Inc.
Vendor ID 26767
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Caf? Layal
Vendor ID 47575
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Cedars Bakery
Vendor ID 55679
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Cigna HealthCare
Vendor ID 63069
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Face to Face Communications
Vendor ID 109189
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Farouk Systems Group
Vendor ID 110635
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Farouk Systems Inc.
Vendor ID 110636
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
HSC Inc.
Vendor ID 152852
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Hughes-Felder #4
Vendor ID 153255
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Majestic Transportation
Vendor ID 201059
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.