Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

KEDA

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 175666 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$27,888.36
Client Filers
17
Payments
29
Activity Range
03/13/2000–01/26/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 17 connected filers · 29 payments · $27,888.36 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Menendez, Jose (The Honorable)$6,120.00602/27/2016
2Torres, Tina C. (Ms.)$5,000.00210/12/2020
3Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$4,510.00607/17/2018
4San Antonio Police Officers Associaction PAC$2,500.00105/20/2009
5Ramirez IV, Frank A. (Mr.)$1,500.00110/26/2021
6FAGIN, MILTON (Mr.)$1,350.00105/16/2012
7Borrego, Jorge Antonio (Mr.)$1,000.00101/26/2026
8Salinas, Laura (Mrs.)$900.00105/11/2012
9Gonzales, Norma (Ms.)$850.00210/29/2010
10Bexar County Democratic Party (CEC)$800.00111/05/2020
11Diaz, Maria (Ms.)$800.00110/26/2010
12Garcia, Gia Jolene (The Honorable)$750.00110/18/2024
13Quezada, Carlos G. (Mr.)$500.00101/15/2024
14Courage, John$450.00104/06/2004
15Morales, Dan$361.25103/08/2002
16Northwest Democrats of Bexar County PAC$297.11110/26/2000
17Van De Putte, Leticia (The Honorable)$200.00103/13/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 33267
15 88.2% 184 8.1%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
13 76.5% 1,480 0.9%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
13 76.5% 1,669 0.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
13 76.5% 3,017 0.4%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
12 70.6% 1,876 0.6%
PRESTIGE PRINTING
Vendor ID 249363
11 64.7% 187 5.7%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
11 64.7% 1,174 0.9%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
11 64.7% 1,327 0.8%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
11 64.7% 1,536 0.7%
IDEAS UNLIMITED
Vendor ID 155276
9 52.9% 66 12.2%
ALLIED ADVERTISING
Vendor ID 11812
9 52.9% 225 3.9%
FROST BANK
Vendor ID 123488
9 52.9% 654 1.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/26/2026Borrego, Jorge Antonio (Mr.)$1,000.00Political Advertisment
10/18/2024Garcia, Gia Jolene (The Honorable)$750.00Radio Advertising
01/15/2024Quezada, Carlos G. (Mr.)$500.00radio advertising
10/26/2021Ramirez IV, Frank A. (Mr.)$1,500.00Radio Ads
11/05/2020Bexar County Democratic Party (CEC)$800.00 Political Advertising
10/12/2020Torres, Tina C. (Ms.)$3,000.00Radio commercials
02/18/2020Torres, Tina C. (Ms.)$2,000.00Spanish radio ads
07/17/2018Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$300.00Radio
03/06/2018Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$360.00Radio Ad
03/02/2018Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$1,500.00Radio Ad
11/10/2016Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$575.00Radio
11/07/2016Uresti, Tomas (The Honorable)$900.00Radio
02/27/2016Menendez, Jose (The Honorable)$1,200.00Radio Ad
02/24/2016Uresti, Tomas (Mr.)$875.00Radio
02/09/2015Menendez, Jose (The Honorable)$840.00Radio Spots
02/09/2015Menendez, Jose (The Honorable)$840.00Radio Spots
05/16/2012FAGIN, MILTON (Mr.)$1,350.00Advertising
05/11/2012Salinas, Laura (Mrs.)$900.00Campaign commercial
10/29/2010Gonzales, Norma (Ms.)$510.00radio ad
10/26/2010Diaz, Maria (Ms.)$800.00Radio Advertising
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.