Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JUAN HINOJOSA CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 170405 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$712,820.44
Client Filers
135
Payments
428
Activity Range
05/02/2000–12/11/2024
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 135 connected filers · 428 payments · $712,820.44 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- JUAN HINOJOSA CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
100 | 74.1% | 325 | 27.8% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
97 | 71.9% | 325 | 26.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
92 | 68.1% | 524 | 16.2% |
|
JUDITH ZAFFIRINI CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 171872
|
91 | 67.4% | 206 | 36.4% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
91 | 67.4% | 253 | 30.6% |
|
JOHN WHITMIRE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168462
|
90 | 66.7% | 235 | 32.1% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
89 | 65.9% | 289 | 26.6% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
89 | 65.9% | 295 | 26.1% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
88 | 65.2% | 268 | 27.9% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
86 | 63.7% | 227 | 31.2% |
|
CAROL ALVARADO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 52699
|
86 | 63.7% | 252 | 28.6% |
|
LOIS KOLKHORST CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 194006
|
85 | 63.0% | 209 | 32.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.