Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JIM LANDTROOP CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 165392 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$544,632.08
Client Filers
71
Payments
162
Activity Range
11/30/2005–02/11/2016
Largest Payment
$67,500.00
Graph: 71 connected filers · 162 payments · $544,632.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- JIM LANDTROOP CAMPAIGN
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
53 | 74.6% | 524 | 9.8% |
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
52 | 73.2% | 386 | 12.8% |
|
KEN PAXTON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176536
|
51 | 71.8% | 241 | 19.5% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
51 | 71.8% | 325 | 14.8% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
48 | 67.6% | 295 | 15.1% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
48 | 67.6% | 325 | 13.8% |
|
KEL SELIGER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176013
|
47 | 66.2% | 190 | 22.0% |
|
SARAH DAVIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 276235
|
47 | 66.2% | 215 | 19.7% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
46 | 64.8% | 230 | 18.0% |
|
MYRA CROWNOVER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 220752
|
45 | 63.4% | 151 | 25.4% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
45 | 63.4% | 187 | 21.1% |
|
DAN FLYNN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 83576
|
45 | 63.4% | 192 | 20.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2016 | Empower Texans PAC | $40,000.00 | Donation |
| 12/28/2015 | Empower Texans PAC | $25,000.00 | Donation |
| 08/22/2012 | Empower Texans PAC | $1,053.08 | Donation to campaign |
| 08/14/2012 | Paxton Jr., W. Kenneth (Mr.) | $2,500.00 | campaign contribution |
| 07/24/2012 | Texas Association of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution - HD 88 |
| 07/23/2012 | King, Phillip S. Phil | $2,000.00 | Campaign support |
| 07/23/2012 | King, Phillip S. Phil | $2,000.00 | Campaign support |
| 07/19/2012 | Hughes, D. Bryan (Mr.) | $5,150.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 07/15/2012 | Hughes, D. Bryan (Mr.) | $5,000.00 | Contribution |
| 07/10/2012 | HOMEPAC of Texas | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 07/09/2012 | Haggerty, Patrick (Mr.) | $100.00 | Campaign contribution. |
| 07/03/2012 | Oncor Political Action Committee of Oncor Electric Delivery Administration Corp. | $750.00 | Jim Landtroop - TX REP DIST 85 |
| 07/02/2012 | Empower Texans PAC | $151.20 | In-Kind contribution of campaign buttons |
| 06/28/2012 | White, James | $250.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 06/27/2012 | Simpson, David (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 06/25/2012 | Cain, Erwin (Mr.) | $1,500.00 | Political contribution to campaign |
| 06/25/2012 | Filing as if SPAC pursuant to 254.204 Election Code | $1,500.00 | Contribution to Jim Landtroop Campaign |
| 06/20/2012 | Texas Land Title Assocaition PAC | $100.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 06/19/2012 | Texas Veterinary Medical Assn. PAC | $500.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/19/2012 | Texas Land Title Assocaition PAC | $400.00 | Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.