Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Good Message Collaborations LLC

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 131335 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$65,124.93
Client Filers
2
Payments
14
Activity Range
08/25/2020–01/31/2023
Largest Payment
$6,646.90
Graph: 2 connected filers · 14 payments · $65,124.93 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Boot Texas Republicans$56,124.931201/31/2023
2Beat Abbott PAC$9,000.00211/05/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Data Driven Democrats LLC
Vendor ID 84565
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Kidd Media Concepts
Vendor ID 178129
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Kos Media LLC
Vendor ID 181011
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Opt-In Strategies
Vendor ID 233611
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Digital Strategy Group
Vendor ID 90815
2 100.0% 5 40.0%
Amalgamated Bank
Vendor ID 13295
2 100.0% 64 3.1%
ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES
Vendor ID 6397
2 100.0% 195 1.0%
STRIPE
Vendor ID 298046
2 100.0% 283 0.7%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
2 100.0% 620 0.3%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
2 100.0% 1,638 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.