Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

FT. WORTH STAR TELEGRAM

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 123858 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$5,132.51
Client Filers
6
Payments
19
Activity Range
05/01/2000–03/26/2019
Largest Payment
$537.55
Graph: 6 connected filers · 19 payments · $5,132.51 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Woolridge, Ruby (Ms.)$2,529.60610/29/2004
2Patrick, Diane$1,069.68408/09/2014
3Harris, Chris (The Honorable)$785.60604/19/2004
4Arlington Police Assn PAC$537.55111/15/2001
5Restaurant & Beverage Alliance of Texas$130.18103/26/2019
6Carter, Bill G.$79.90106/01/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 83.3% 3,017 0.2%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
4 66.7% 677 0.6%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
4 66.7% 1,536 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
4 66.7% 1,958 0.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
4 66.7% 1,876 0.2%
BABES CHICKEN
Vendor ID 26017
3 50.0% 7 30.0%
PICCOLO MONDO
Vendor ID 244178
3 50.0% 13 18.8%
WESTLAKE HARDWARE
Vendor ID 352415
3 50.0% 15 16.7%
ARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 19889
3 50.0% 32 8.6%
FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM
Vendor ID 116699
3 50.0% 32 8.6%
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL
Vendor ID 15120
3 50.0% 150 2.0%
BOOKER INDUSTRIES
Vendor ID 38936
3 50.0% 186 1.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/23/2009SUDDERTH, BONNIE$39.90NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
08/31/2009SUDDERTH, BONNIE$39.90NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
07/01/2009SUDDERTH, BONNIE$35.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
03/01/2009SUDDERTH, BONNIE$35.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
01/01/2009SUDDERTH, BONNIE$35.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
10/12/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$35.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
08/29/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$35.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
07/01/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
05/01/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
03/01/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
01/07/2008SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
12/31/2006SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
11/01/2006SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
07/01/2006SUDDERTH, BONNIE$32.00NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
06/15/2004SUDDERTH, BONNIE$45.00Subscription
03/29/2004SUDDERTH, BONNIE$45.00Subscription
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.