Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
EXPRESS SELF STORAGE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 107832 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$22,535.84
Client Filers
4
Payments
240
Activity Range
12/27/2006–06/01/2026
Largest Payment
$442.50
Graph: 4 connected filers · 240 payments · $22,535.84 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- EXPRESS SELF STORAGE
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonnen, Dennis H. (The Honorable) | $9,917.36 | 111 | 12/02/2019 |
| 2 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $8,126.13 | 90 | 06/01/2026 |
| 3 | BRAZORIA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY | $2,893.00 | 20 | 12/01/2012 |
| 4 | North Brazoria County Democratic Club | $1,599.35 | 19 | 07/14/2009 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
4 | 100.0% | 1,445 | 0.3% |
|
CITY OF ANGLETON
Vendor ID 65052
|
3 | 75.0% | 8 | 33.3% |
|
THE FACTS
Vendor ID 318717
|
3 | 75.0% | 20 | 14.3% |
|
EL PATIO
Vendor ID 101787
|
3 | 75.0% | 22 | 13.0% |
|
PEARLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 240928
|
3 | 75.0% | 27 | 10.7% |
|
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS
Vendor ID 148037
|
3 | 75.0% | 313 | 1.0% |
|
VISTA PRINT
Vendor ID 345789
|
3 | 75.0% | 453 | 0.7% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
3 | 75.0% | 785 | 0.4% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,101 | 0.3% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,638 | 0.2% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,536 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 05/01/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 04/01/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 03/02/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 02/02/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 01/01/2026 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 12/01/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 11/01/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 10/01/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 09/03/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 08/02/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 07/02/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 06/03/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 05/02/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 04/02/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 03/04/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 02/02/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 01/03/2025 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign Storage |
| 12/03/2024 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
| 11/03/2024 | Vasut, Cody T. (The Honorable) | $106.00 | Campaign storage |
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.